A comparative study of research performance in computer science

被引:90
作者
Guan, JC [1 ]
Ma, N
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Sch Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Res Ctr Technol Innovat, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045114.85737.1b
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The paper compares the research performance in computer science of four major Western countries, India and China, based on the data abstracted from INSPEC database during the period 1993-2002. A total of 9,632 computer science papers recorded in INSPEC database were used for the comparison. The findings indicate that, on the one hand, the number of papers produced in China has considerably increased in the past few years. Particularly, in recent years, China occupies a remarkable high position in terms of counts of papers indexed by the INSPEC database. On the other hand, Chinese scientists preferred to publish in domestic journals and proceedings and shares of SCI-papers to the total journal papers for China have still remained the lowest. This indicates that the research activities of Chinese scientists in computer science are still rather "local" and suffer from a low international visibility. Various scientometric indicators, such as Normalized Impact Factor, ratio of papers in high quality journals are further adopted to analyze research performance and diverse finding are obtained. Nevertheless, for these surrogate indicators, China has optimistically achieved great progress, characterized with "low level of beginning and high speed of developing". The policy implication of the findings lies in that China, as well as other less developed countries in science, can earn relative competitive advantages in some new emerging or younger disciplines such as computer science by properly using catch-up strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 359
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   COLLABORATIVE COEFFICIENT - A SINGLE MEASURE OF THE DEGREE OF COLLABORATION IN RESEARCH [J].
AJIFERUKE, I ;
BURELL, Q ;
TAGUE, J .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1988, 14 (5-6) :421-433
[2]  
ARUNACHALAM S, 1993, CURR SCI INDIA, V65, P809
[3]   Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country [J].
Bordons, M ;
Fernández, MT ;
Gómez, I .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) :195-206
[4]   PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY - FROM FREQUENCY-DISTRIBUTIONS TO SCIENTOMETRIC INDICATORS [J].
BRAUN, T ;
GLANZEL, W ;
SCHUBERT, A .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1990, 16 (01) :37-44
[5]  
Braun T., 1985, SCIENTOMETRIC INDICA
[6]   THE ADEQUACY OF THE SCIENCE CITATION INDEX (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY [J].
CARPENTER, MP ;
NARIN, F .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1981, 32 (06) :430-439
[7]  
Egghe L, 2002, CAN J INFORM LIB SCI, V27, P29
[8]  
FRAME J D, 1977, Interciencia, V2, P143
[9]  
FRAME JD, 1987, SCIENTOMETRICS, V12, P135
[10]   Scientometric study of laser patent literature [J].
Garg, KC ;
Padhi, P .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1998, 43 (03) :443-454