Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance

被引:277
作者
Park, Byung-Jin [1 ]
Srivastava, Manish K. [2 ]
Gnyawali, Devi R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Sch Business, Business Adm Div, Seoul 133791, South Korea
[2] Michigan Technol Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[3] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Virginia Tech, RB Pamplin Coll Business, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
Coopetition; Balanced coopetition; Innovation performance; Semiconductor industry; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; MARKET COMPETITION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE; CAPABILITY; ADVANTAGE; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study empirically investigates an important question in the coopetition literature: to what extent does coopetition impact a firm's innovation performance? With a focus on the intensity of competition and intensity of cooperation of a focal firm with its alliance partners, our theory proposes that a moderate level of competition with alliance partners is more beneficial than a very high or a very low level of competition. We further develop the concept of "balance" in coopetition and examine how the interplay of competition and cooperation and the balance between the two matter for innovation performance. Results from our empirical study using data from the semiconductor industry show that competition and cooperation intensities have non-monotonic positive relationship with firm's coopetition-based innovation performance. Further, balanced coopetition (i.e., when competition is moderately high and cooperation is high) has a positive effect on innovation performance. A key contribution of this paper is the conceptualization and empirical demonstration of the effects of various aspects of coopetition such as competition dominant, cooperation dominant, and balanced coopetition on innovation performance. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 221
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[21]  
Greve HR, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P685, DOI [10.2307/30040661, 10.5465/30040661]
[22]   COMPETITION FOR COMPETENCE AND INTER-PARTNER LEARNING WITHIN INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC ALLIANCES [J].
HAMEL, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 12 :83-103
[23]  
Heiman B.A., 2004, MANAG DECIS ECON, V25, P401, DOI [10.1002/mde.1198, DOI 10.1002/MDE.1198]
[24]   The effect of competitive and non-competitive R&D collaboration on firm innovation [J].
Huang, Kuo-Feng ;
Yu, Chwo-Ming Joseph .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2011, 36 (04) :383-403
[25]  
Kale P, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.3.CO
[26]  
2-P
[27]  
Khanna T, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V19, P193, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<193::AID-SMJ949>3.3.CO
[28]  
2-3
[29]   Competing and Cooperating Similarity in Global Strategic Alliances: An Exploratory Examination [J].
Kim, Jooheon ;
Parkhe, Arvind .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2009, 20 (03) :363-376
[30]   The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success [J].
Knudsen, Mette Praest .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2007, 24 (02) :117-138