Correspondence analysis for detecting land cover change

被引:55
作者
Cakir, HI [1 ]
Khorram, S [1 ]
Nelson, SAC [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
correspondence analysis; LULC change detection; principal component analysis; normalized difference vegetation index;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The correspondence analysis (CA) method was applied to two multitemporal Landsat images of Raleigh, North Carolina for land use land cover (LULC) change detection. After the spectral transformation of the individual date images into component space using CA, the first component (PC1) of the date I image was subtracted from the PC1 of the date 2 image to produce difference image highlighting change areas. Accuracy curves based on the cumulative Producer's and User's accuracies were then used to optimally locate threshold (cutoff) values in the high-end and low-end tails of the difference image's histogram. Results were then compared to the standardized and non-standardized Principal Component Analysis (PCA) differencing and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) differencing methods for change detection. Results showed that there was 6.8% increase in urban related cover types in Raleigh metropolitan area between 1993 and 1999. Also, maps based on the CA differencing method were found to be thematically more accurate than maps based on PCA component differencing methods. Overall accuracy of change map produced by the CA method for the Raleigh metropolitan area was 92.5% with overall Kappa value of 0.88. In general, CA was found to be a powerful multivariate analysis technique when applied to change detection. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 317
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BIGING G, 1998, TITLE REMOTE SENSING
[2]  
BYRNE GF, 1980, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V20, P95
[3]  
Carr JR, 1999, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V65, P909
[4]   Retrieving leaf area index of boreal conifer forests using landsat TM images [J].
Chen, JM ;
Cihlar, J .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 55 (02) :153-162
[5]  
CONGALTON R.G, 1999, ASSESSING ACCURACY R, P49
[6]  
CONGALTON RG, 1983, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V49, P69
[7]  
Coppin P. O. L. R., 1996, Remote Sensing Reviews, V13, P612, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/02757259609532305, DOI 10.1080/02757259609532305, 10.1080/02757259609532305]
[8]   The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection [J].
Dai, XL ;
Khorram, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 36 (05) :1566-1577
[9]  
DARYEI J, 2003, THESIS I AEROSPACE S
[10]  
DOBSON JE, 1995, 123 NMFS NOAA US DEP