Robust classification of renal cell carcinoma based on gene expression data and predicted cytogenetic profiles

被引:78
作者
Furge, KA
Lucas, KA
Takahashi, M
Sugimura, J
Kort, EJ
Kanayama, H
Kagawa, S
Hoekstra, P
Curry, J
Yang, XMJ
Teh, BT
机构
[1] Van Andel Res Inst, Bioinformat Special Program, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[2] Van Andel Res Inst, Canc Genet Lab, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[3] Univ Tokushima, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Tokushima 770, Japan
[4] Iwate Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
[5] Univ Chicago, Canc Res Ctr, Dept Pathol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Spectrum Hlth Hosp, Div Urol, Grand Rapids, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0534
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease that includes several histologically distinct subtypes. The most common RCC subtypes are clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe, and recent gene expression profiling studies suggest that classification of RCC based on transcriptional signatures could be beneficial. Traditionally, however, patterns of chromosomal alterations have been used to assist in the molecular classification of RCC. The purpose of this study was to determine whether it was possible to develop a classification model for the three major RCC subtypes that utilizes gene expression profiles as the bases for both molecular genetic and cytogenetic classification. Gene expression profiles were first used to build an expression-based RCC classifier. The RCC gene expression profiles were then examined for the presence of regional gene expression biases. Regional expression biases are genetic intervals that contain a disproportionate number of genes that are coordinately up- or down-regulated. The presence of a regional gene expression bias often indicates the presence of a chromosomal abnormality. In this study, we demonstrate an expression-based classifier can distinguish between the three most common RCC subtypes in 99% of cases (n = 73). We also demonstrate that detection of regional expression biases accurately identifies cytogenetic features common to RCC. Additionally, the in silico-derived cytogenetic profiles could be used to classify 81% of cases. Taken together, these data demonstrate that it is possible to construct a robust classification model for RCC using both transcriptional and cytogenetic features derived from a gene expression profile.
引用
收藏
页码:4117 / 4121
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Identification and classification of differentially expressed genes in renal cell carcinoma by expression profiling on a global human 31,500-element cDNA array [J].
Boer, JM ;
Huber, WK ;
Sültmann, H ;
Wilmer, F ;
von Heydebreck, A ;
Haas, S ;
Korn, B ;
Gunawan, B ;
Vente, A ;
Füzesi, L ;
Vingron, M ;
Poustka, A .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2001, 11 (11) :1861-1870
[2]  
Bugert P, 1996, AM J PATHOL, V149, P2081
[3]   Ensembl 2002: accommodating comparative genomics [J].
Clamp, M ;
Andrews, D ;
Barker, D ;
Bevan, P ;
Cameron, G ;
Chen, Y ;
Clark, L ;
Cox, T ;
Cuff, J ;
Curwen, V ;
Down, T ;
Durbin, R ;
Eyras, E ;
Gilbert, J ;
Hammond, M ;
Hubbard, T ;
Kasprzyk, A ;
Keefe, D ;
Lehvaslaiho, H ;
Iyer, V ;
Melsopp, C ;
Mongin, E ;
Pettett, R ;
Potter, S ;
Rust, A ;
Schmidt, E ;
Searle, S ;
Slater, G ;
Smith, J ;
Spooner, W ;
Stabenau, A ;
Stalker, J ;
Stupka, E ;
Ureta-Vidal, A ;
Vastrik, I ;
Birney, E .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (01) :38-42
[4]  
Crawley JJ, 2002, GENOME BIOL, V3
[5]   Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns [J].
Eisen, MB ;
Spellman, PT ;
Brown, PO ;
Botstein, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (25) :14863-14868
[6]  
Gunawan B, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P7731
[7]  
Guo X, 2002, INT J ONCOL, V21, P1197
[8]  
HADDAD R, 2002, APPL GENOM PROTEOM, V1, P51
[9]  
Harding MA, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P6981
[10]   Gene expression patterns in renal cell carcinoma assessed by complementary DNA microarray [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Shinghal, R ;
Gill, H ;
Reese, JH ;
Terris, M ;
Cohen, RJ ;
Fero, M ;
Pollack, JR ;
van de Rijn, M ;
Brooks, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2003, 162 (03) :925-932