Ileal pouch salvage following failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

被引:20
作者
Saltzberg, SS [1 ]
DiEdwardo, C [1 ]
Scott, TE [1 ]
LaMorte, WW [1 ]
Stucchi, AF [1 ]
Becker, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; IPAA; ileal pouch salvage; ulcerative colitis; familial polyposis;
D O I
10.1016/S1091-255X(99)80086-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Attempts have been made to salvage failed ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA) performed for ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis coli. These can be categorized as total reconstruction of the IPAA, partial transabdominal approach, and partial transperineal approach. The aims of our study were to determine the overall success of pouch salvage; to examine the demographics, indications, and outcomes for each approach; and to assess anorectal physiology and patient satisfaction in those with successful salvage operations. We reviewed data, including results of anorectal manometry from 29 patients undergoing salvage procedures for failed IPA. Seventeen salvage attempts were successful, 11 attempts failed, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Success rates were 100% in the total reconstruction group, 25% in the par tial transabdominal group, and 55% in the transperineal group. In those undergoing total reconstruction of the IPAA (n = 9), functional outcome, as measured by incontinence, improved with 50% reporting incontinence preoperatively compared to 0% postoperatively (P = 0.055). Mean 24-hour stool frequency and nighttime stool frequency declined. All patients reported satisfaction with their outcomes. Sixty percent of patients who underwent ileal pouch salvage following IPAA have been successful in avoiding permanent ileostomy. These results suggest that a continued effort to salvage failed IPAA, including the use of total reconstruction, is a viable alternative to permanent ileostomy.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 640
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - A SINGLE SURGEONS EXPERIENCE WITH 100 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
BECKER, JM ;
RAYMOND, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1986, 204 (04) :375-383
[2]   Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome [J].
Becker, JM ;
LaMorte, W ;
StMarie, G ;
Ferzoco, S .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (06) :653-660
[3]   Reconstructive surgery for pelvic pouches [J].
Cohen, Z ;
Smith, D ;
McLeod, R .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 22 (04) :342-346
[4]  
DOZOIS RR, 1988, PERSPECT COLON RECTA, V1, P113
[5]   ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSES COMPLICATIONS AND FUNCTION IN 1005 PATIENTS [J].
FAZIO, VW ;
ZIV, Y ;
CHURCH, JM ;
OAKLEY, JR ;
LAVERY, IC ;
MILSOM, JW ;
SCHROEDER, TK .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (02) :120-127
[6]   TRANSANAL MUCOSECTOMY - ILEAL POUCH ADVANCEMENT FOR ANORECTAL DYSPLASIA OR INFLAMMATION AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY [J].
FAZIO, VW ;
TJANDRA, JJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (10) :1008-1011
[7]   ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - REOPERATION FOR POUCH-RELATED COMPLICATIONS [J].
GALANDIUK, S ;
SCOTT, NA ;
DOZOIS, RR ;
KELLY, KA ;
ILSTRUP, DM ;
BEART, RW ;
WOLFF, BG ;
PEMBERTON, JH ;
NIVATVONGS, S ;
DEVINE, RM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 212 (04) :446-454
[8]  
KELLY KA, 1992, CURR PROB SURG, V29, P65
[9]   Results from pouch salvage [J].
Korsgen, S ;
Nikiteas, N ;
Ogunbiyi, OA ;
Keighley, MRB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :372-374
[10]   The physiology of ileo-anal pouch function [J].
Levitt, MD ;
Kuan, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 176 (04) :384-389