Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'Col consultancy'

被引：21

作者：

Charlton, BG ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England

来源：

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES | 2004年 / 63卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.mehy.2004.06.001

中图分类号：

R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];

学科分类号：

1001 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：181 / 186

页数：6

共 9 条

[1]

CHARLTON B, 2004, MODERNIZATION IMPERI

[2] Inaugural editorial [J].

Charlton, BG .

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2004, 62 (01) :1-2

[3] Fundamental deficiencies in the megatrial methodology [J].

Charlton, BG .

CURRENT CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2001, 2 (01) :2-7

[4]

Healy D., 1997, ANTIDEPRESSANT ERA

[5]

Healy D., 2002, CREATION PSYCHOPHARM

[6]

Healy D., 2004, Let Them Eat Prozac

[7] THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF PEER-REVIEW AND THE SUPPRESSION OF INNOVATION [J].

HORROBIN, DF .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10) :1438-1441

[8]

Hull D.L., 1988, Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226360492.001.0001

[9]

ZIMAN J, 1993, EASST NEWSLETTER, V12, P23

← 1 →