Recovery and rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury

被引:50
作者
Dombovy, ML
Olek, AC
机构
[1] UNIV ROCHESTER,DEPT NEUROL,ROCHESTER,NY
[2] UNIV ROCHESTER,DEPT ORTHOPED REHABIL,ROCHESTER,NY
关键词
D O I
10.1080/026990597123467
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Although most patients are discharged following traumatic brain injury (TBI) with 'good recovery', recent reports indicate that many have persistent neuropsychological deficits. The purposes of this study were to: (1) determine if functional, neuropsychological and social outcome at 3 and 6 months in patients hospitalized following TBI could be ascertained via telephone follow-up, and (2) assess use of rehabilitation services in this population. Patients were identified through acute hospital admissions. A trained nurse practitioner abstracted data from acute charts. Using the Functional independence Measure (FIM), Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NRS), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), and a social questionnaire she obtained follow-up information at 3 and 6 months post-injury. Of 74 patients initially identified, 51 and 48 were available at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Most experienced mild to moderate TBI. Physical disability was minimal at follow-up as indicated by the FIM. Approximately half of the patients were rated cognitively impaired on the TICS at 3 months and over one-third remained impaired at 6 months. At 6 months 60.5% remained unemployed. Only eight of the 67 discharged survivors received any rehabilitation services. A brief telephone follow-up appears to be a cost-effective way to ascertain functional and neuropsychological outcome in TBI survivors. Since few of these patients received rehabilitation, a telephone follow-up may identify those who would potentially benefit from additional rehabilitation services.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 318
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, NATURAL-HISTORY, AND CLINICAL MANAGEMENT
    ALEXANDER, MP
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (07) : 1253 - 1260
  • [2] BROOKS DN, 1990, REHABILITATION ADULT, P163
  • [3] CONZEN M, 1992, Brain Injury, V6, P45, DOI 10.3109/02699059209008121
  • [4] CORRIGAN J D, 1990, Brain Injury, V4, P215, DOI 10.3109/02699059009026170
  • [5] PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE HEAD-INJURY - 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    DIKMEN, S
    MACHAMER, J
    TEMKIN, N
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 1993, 7 (02) : 113 - 124
  • [6] NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF MINOR HEAD-INJURY
    DIKMEN, S
    MCLEAN, A
    TEMKIN, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 49 (11) : 1227 - 1232
  • [7] Granger CV., 1986, GUIDE USE UNIFORM DA
  • [8] Factors influencing failure to return to work due to traumatic brain injury
    Greenspan, AI
    Wrigley, JM
    Kresnow, M
    BrancheDorsey, CM
    Fine, PR
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 1996, 10 (03) : 207 - 218
  • [9] THE BENEFIT OF REHABILITATION IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - A LITERATURE-REVIEW
    HALL, KM
    COPE, DN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1995, 10 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [10] RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN IMPAIRMENT AND PHYSICAL-DISABILITY AS MEASURED BY THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE
    HEINEMANN, AW
    LINACRE, JM
    WRIGHT, BD
    HAMILTON, BB
    GRANGER, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1993, 74 (06): : 566 - 573