Modeling large electorates with Fourier series, with applications to Nash equilibria in proximity and directional models of spatial competition

被引:3
作者
Merrill, S
Grofman, B
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF IRVINE, SCH SOCIAL SCI, IRVINE, CA 92697 USA
[2] UNIV WASHINGTON, DEPT BIOSTAT, SEATTLE, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Nash Equilibrium; Rule Vote; Directional Model; Vote Game; Large Electorate;
D O I
10.1007/s003550050086
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we introduce harmonic analysis (Fourier series) as a tool for characterizing the existence of Nash equilibria in two-dimensional spatial majority rule voting games with large electorates. We apply our methods both to traditional proximity models and to directional models. In the latter voters exhibit preferences over directions rather than over alternatives, per se. A directional equilibrium can be characterized as a Condorcet direction, in analogy to the Condorcet (majority) winner in the usual voting models, i.e., a direction which is preferred by a majority to (or at least is not beaten by) any other direction. We provide a parallel treatment of the total median condition for equilibrium under proximity voting and equilibrium conditions for directional voting that shows that the former result is in terms of a strict equality (a knife-edge result very unlikely to hold) while the latter is in terms of an inequality which is relatively easy to satisfy. For the Matthews [3] directional model and a variant of the Rabinowitz and Macdonald [7] directional model, we present a sufficiency condition for the existence of a Condorcet directional vector in terms of the odd-numbered components of the Fourier series representing the density distribution of the voter points. We interpret our theoretical results by looking at real-world voter distributions and direction fields among voter points derived from U.S. and Norwegian survey data.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 562
页数:18
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   CONSTRAINED PLOTT EQUILIBRIA, DIRECTIONAL EQUILIBRIA AND GLOBAL CYCLING SETS [J].
COHEN, L ;
MATTHEWS, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (05) :975-986
[2]   SOCIAL PREFERENCE ORDERINGS AND MAJORITY RULE [J].
DAVIS, OA ;
HINICH, MJ ;
DEGROOT, MH .
ECONOMETRICA, 1972, 40 (01) :147-&
[3]   SIMPLE DIRECTION MODEL OF ELECTORAL COMPETITION [J].
MATTHEWS, SA .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1979, 34 (02) :141-156
[4]   CONDITIONS FOR VOTING EQUILIBRIA IN CONTINUOUS VOTER DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
MCKELVEY, RD ;
ORDESHOOK, PC ;
UNGAR, P .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1980, 39 (01) :161-168
[5]  
MERRILL S, 1996, ANN M PUBL CHOIC SOC
[6]  
Plott CR, 1967, AM ECON REV, V57, P787
[7]   A DIRECTIONAL THEORY OF ISSUE VOTING [J].
RABINOWITZ, G ;
MACDONALD, SE .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1989, 83 (01) :93-121
[8]  
Zygmund A., 2002, Trigonometric Series, V1