Measuring exposure to cannabis use and other substance use in remote aboriginal populations in northern Australia: Evaluation of a 'community epidemiology' approach using proxy respondents

被引:20
作者
Clough, AR [1 ]
Cairney, S
D'Abbs, P
Parker, R
Maruff, P
Gray, D
O'Reilly, B
机构
[1] Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Darwin, NT, Australia
[2] Charles Darwin Univ, Darwin, NT, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[4] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Clin, Darwin, NT, Australia
[6] Curtin Univ, Natl Drug Res Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
aboriginal; substance use; proxy respondents; consensus classification;
D O I
10.1080/16066350410001667143
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluate a method to describe changing substance use patterns in northern Australia's remote Aboriginal communities (Arnhem Land, Northern Territory). Substance use was assessed in random samples in two communities A (n = 194) and B (n = 176). Five Aboriginal health workers made assessments independently of each other in community A. A different group of three health workers made independent assessments in community B. Sub-samples were opportunistically recruited for interview (community A, n = 77; community B, n = 55). In community C, 10 1 people were interviewed and were also assessed by four local health workers working together. Proportional agreements (kappa-kappa statistic) among health workers for a history of substance use and current use, varied from kappa=0.207 for petrol sniffing (P=0.006) up to kappa=0.749 for cannabis use (P<0.001), all better than would be expected by chance. In communities A and 13, agreement between health workers' consensus and self-reported substance use was weaker (0.103<kappa<0.482) probably because of under-reporting in interviews. In community C, where interviews were conducted in a confidential clinic setting, agreement between health workers' concensus and self-report varied from kappa=0.273 for petrol sniffing (P<0.001) up to 0.819 for tobacco use (P<0.001). Aboriginal health worker consensus classification clarified equivocal self-report data.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 274
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J DRUG POLICY
[3]  
[Anonymous], WORLD 1 AUSTR
[4]  
Armstrong BruceK., 1992, PRINCIPLES EXPOSURE
[5]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2002, 2001 CENS IND PROF N
[6]   COMPARING 2 METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT - A PERSONAL HISTORY [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 24 :S7-S14
[7]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[8]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[9]   PATTERNS OF PETROL SNIFFING AND OTHER DRUG-USE IN YOUNG MEN FROM AN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY IN ARNHEM-LAND, NORTHERN-TERRITORY [J].
BURNS, CB ;
DABBS, P ;
CURRIE, BJ .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 1995, 14 (02) :159-169
[10]   Kava in Arnhem Land: a review of consumption and its social correlates [J].
Clough, AR ;
Burns, CB ;
Mununggurr, N .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2000, 19 (03) :319-328