Grading odor similarities in a Go/No-Go task

被引:13
作者
Kay, Leslie M.
Krysiak, Magdalena
Barlas, Lale
Bloom Edgerton, Gabrielle
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Coll, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Comm Neurobiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
odor mixtures; partial reinforcement; olfactory behavior; operant conditioning; odor perception;
D O I
10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.04.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent studies show that some features of odor perception are predicted by olfactory receptor biophysics and olfactory bulb physiology. Those studies used a behavioral assay in which rodents dig in a dish of scented cage bedding after pretraining to associate a buried reward with an odorant. The advantage of the digging task is an intensity measure of similarity (number of seconds spent digging). The method has the disadvantages of odorant contamination and low control over concentration and timing, making it difficult to use in electrophysiology. We describe an operant task that avoids these disadvantages and provides a reliable intensity-based similarity measure. Odorants can be delivered with a standard air dilution olfactometer, and rats learn to lever press to one odorant and avoid pressing to another in a Go/No-Go (CS+/CS-) task with a partial reinforcement protocol. Generalization tests substitute a portion of the unrewarded CS+ trials with test odorants. The number of generalization trials on which a subject responds to a test odorant is the measure of odor similarity intensity. We present validation tests using mixture component recognition, which show high repeatability, little variability across subjects and no decrease in responding across sessions. The results match those obtained with the digging task in four of five mixtures tested. This method allows optimal control over stimulus parameters and is compatible with simultaneous electrophysiological recording. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 346
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The molecular receptive range of an odorant receptor [J].
Araneda, RC ;
Kini, AD ;
Firestein, S .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (12) :1248-1255
[2]   A pharmacological profile of the aldehyde receptor repertoire in rat olfactory epithelium [J].
Araneda, RC ;
Peterlin, Z ;
Zhang, X ;
Chesler, A ;
Firestein, S .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2004, 555 (03) :743-756
[3]   Odorant receptor expression defines functional units in the mouse olfactory system [J].
Bozza, T ;
Feinstein, P ;
Zheng, C ;
Mombaerts, P .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 22 (08) :3033-3043
[4]   A NOVEL MULTIGENE FAMILY MAY ENCODE ODORANT RECEPTORS - A MOLECULAR-BASIS FOR ODOR RECOGNITION [J].
BUCK, L ;
AXEL, R .
CELL, 1991, 65 (01) :175-187
[5]   Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans [J].
Bunsey, M ;
Eichenbaum, H .
NATURE, 1996, 379 (6562) :255-257
[6]   Behavioral models of odor similarity [J].
Cleland, TA ;
Morse, A ;
Yue, EL ;
Linster, C .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 116 (02) :222-231
[7]   Concentration tuning mediated by spare receptor capacity in olfactory sensory neurons: A theoretical study [J].
Cleland, TA ;
Linster, C .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1999, 11 (07) :1673-1690
[8]   A novel family of divergent seven-transmembrane proteins:: Candidate odorant receptors in Drosophila [J].
Clyne, PJ ;
Warr, CG ;
Freeman, MR ;
Lessing, D ;
Kim, JH ;
Carlson, JR .
NEURON, 1999, 22 (02) :327-338
[9]   Odor response properties of rat olfactory receptor neurons [J].
Duchamp-Viret, P ;
Chaput, MA ;
Duchamp, A .
SCIENCE, 1999, 284 (5423) :2171-2174
[10]   Molecular mechanisms underlying differential odor responses of a mouse olfactory receptor [J].
Floriano, WB ;
Vaidehi, N ;
Goddard, WA ;
Singer, MS ;
Shepherd, GM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (20) :10712-10716