Construct validation of a novel hybrid surgical simulator

被引:45
作者
Broe, D [1 ]
Ridgway, PF [1 ]
Johnson, S [1 ]
Tierney, S [1 ]
Conlon, KC [1 ]
机构
[1] Adelaide & Meath Hsop, Natl Childrens Hosp, Professorial Surg Unit, Dept Surg, Dublin 24, Ireland
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2006年 / 20卷 / 06期
关键词
construct; hybrid; simulation; surgery; training; validity;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-005-0530-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Simulated minimal access surgery has improved recently as both a learning and assessment tool. The construct validation of a novel simulator, ProMis, is described for use by residents in training. Methods: ProMis is a surgical simulator that can design tasks in both virtual and actual reality. A pilot group of surgical residents ranging from novice to expert completed three standardized tasks: orientation, dissection, and basic suturing. The tasks were tested for construct validity. Two experienced surgeons examined the recorded tasks in a blinded fashion using an objective structured assessment of technical skills format (OS-ATS: task-specific checklist and global rating score) as well as metrics delivered by the simulator. Results: The findings showed excellent interrater reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.88 for the checklist and 0.93 for the global rating). The median scores in the experience groups were statistically different in both the global rating and the task-specific checklists (p < 0.05). The scores for the orientation task alone did not reach significance (p = 0.1), suggesting that modification is required before ProMis could be used in isolation as an assessment tool. Conclusions: The three simulated tasks in combination are construct valid for differentiating experience levels among surgeons in training. This hybrid simulator has potential added benefits of marrying the virtual with actual, and of combining simple box traits and advanced virtual reality simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 904
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
The simulated operating theatre: comprehensive training for surgical teams [J].
Aggarwal, R ;
Undre, S ;
Moorthy, K ;
Vincent, C ;
Darzi, A .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 :I27-I32
[2]
SURGICAL HANDICRAFT - TEACHING AND LEARNING SURGICAL SKILLS [J].
BARNES, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 153 (05) :422-427
[3]
BROE D, 2004, EAES FOR BARC
[4]
The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments [J].
Datta, V ;
Chang, A ;
Mackay, S ;
Darzi, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 184 (01) :70-73
[5]
Comparison of bench test evaluations of surgical skill with live operating performance assessments [J].
Datta, V ;
Bann, S ;
Beard, J ;
Mandalia, M ;
Darzi, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (04) :603-606
[6]
The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model [J].
Datta, V ;
Mackay, S ;
Mandalia, M ;
Darzi, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 193 (05) :479-485
[7]
Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents [J].
Faulkner, H ;
Regehr, G ;
Martin, J ;
Reznick, R .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (12) :1363-1365
[8]
Gonzalez R, 2004, AM SURGEON, V70, P35
[9]
Who should rate candidates in an objective structured clinical examination? [J].
Martin, JA ;
Reznick, RK ;
Rothman, A ;
Tamblyn, RM ;
Regehr, G .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (02) :170-175
[10]
Testing technical skill via an innovative ''bench station'' examination [J].
Reznick, R ;
Regehr, G ;
MacRae, H ;
Martin, J ;
McCulloch, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (03) :226-230