A new decision support method for the selection of RP process: knowledge value measuring

被引:28
作者
Zhang, Yicha [1 ]
Xu, Yang [2 ]
Bernard, Alain [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Cent Nantes, IRCCyN, Nantes, France
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Informat Management, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
knowledge value measuring; multi-attribute decision-making (MADM); decision support; RP process selection; PROTOTYPING PROCESS SELECTION; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/0951192X.2013.834474
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
080201 [机械制造及其自动化];
摘要
Many RP processes (rapid prototyping) have now been perfected and play an important role in creating prototypes as a support to the product development and in producing functional parts for direct applications. However, the selection of the right RP process or system for specific applications is becoming more difficult due to the expanding alternatives and their conflicting manufacturing properties, which form a classical multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem. To deal with the problem, this paper introduces a new method based on measuring manufacturing knowledge value extracted from RP processes. Knowledge unit and explicit knowledge value are redefined within the RP application context so as to apply an improved knowledge value measuring model which measures explicit knowledge value directly based on the deviation extent between knowledge units and the aspired application goals or preferences. The new method has some advantages when compared to former methods due to its simplicity and efficiency of using structured expert knowledge or production experience. It also has the potential to be widely applied in other fields where MADM problems exist, and to improve the efficiency of the present knowledge-based systems.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 758
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Ammar-Khodja S., 2008, METHODS TOOLS EFFECT, P3
[2]
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[3]
Bernard A, 1999, SOL FREEFORM FABRIC, P39
[4]
Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital [J].
Bontis, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2001, 3 (01) :41-60
[5]
Bontis N., 1999, EUR MANAG J, V17, P391, DOI [10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00019-5, DOI 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00019-5]
[6]
A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method [J].
Byun, HS ;
Lee, KH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 26 (11-12) :1338-1347
[7]
Creating a database of rapid prototyping system capabilities. [J].
Campbell, RI ;
Bernie, MRN .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 61 (1-2) :163-167
[8]
The knowledge chain model: activities for competitiveness [J].
Holsapple, CW ;
Singh, M .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2001, 20 (01) :77-98
[9]
Hornberger L. E., 1999, RAPIDPROTOTYPING PRO
[10]
The construction and application of knowledge navigator model (KNM™): An evaluation of knowledge management maturity [J].
Hsieh, Ping Jung ;
Lin, Binshan ;
Lin, Chinho .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) :4087-4100