Evaluation of anti-cocaine antibodies and a cocaine vaccine in a rat self-administration model

被引:129
作者
Kantak, KN
Collins, SL
Lipman, EG
Bond, J
Giovanoni, K
Fox, BS
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Psychol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Psychol, Lab Behav Neurosci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] ImmuLog Pharmaceut Corp, Waltham, MA USA
关键词
active immunization; anti-cocaine antibody; cocaine; cocaine vaccine; IPC-1010; second-order schedule of drug delivery; self-administration;
D O I
10.1007/s002130050049
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: Previous pre-clinical studies with an anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody left open several issues critical to assessing the effectiveness of a vaccine for altering cocaine self-administration behavior. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine, first, whether changes in self-administration behavior would be systematically related to antibody level and, second, how the antibody affected the self-administration of different doses of cocaine. Methods: Two experiments were conducted using a second-order schedule of drug delivery in rats. The first was a passive-administration study using the anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody MO240 to examine the relationship between antibody level and cocaine self-administration behavior, and the second was an active-immunization study to examine the efficacy of the cocaine vaccine IPC-1010 for blocking various doses of self-administered cocaine. Results: The passive-administration experiment with control and 4-mg or 12-mg MO240 treatments showed that antagonism of the 1 mg/kg cocaine training dose was dependent on antibody level. In animals whose serum antibody levels were sustained above 0.05 mg/ml, there was a sufficient amount of antibody to reduce drug-seeking behavior and drug intake. In the active-immunization experiment, the cocaine vaccine IPC-1010 induced average serum antibody levels of 0.08 mg/ml and reduced the reacquisition of behavior by 1 mg/kg cocaine. Antagonism of cocaine self-administration after immunization was evident across a range of doses of cocaine and was only apparent in animals whose serum antibody levels exceeded 0.05 mg/ml. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the antagonism was surmountable within the dose range examined (up to 5.6 mg/kg). Conclusions: Antagonism of cocaine self-administration across a range of doses is feasible after immunization with a cocaine vaccine as long as antibody levels are of a sufficient concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 262
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
BALSTER R L, 1973, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, V1, P67, DOI 10.1016/0091-3057(73)90057-9
[2]   FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULE OF COCAINE REINFORCEMENT - EFFECT OF DOSE AND INFUSION DURATION [J].
BALSTER, RL ;
SCHUSTER, CR .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1973, 20 (01) :119-129
[3]   CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF COCAINE [J].
BENOWITZ, NL .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 72 (01) :3-12
[4]  
Bergman J., 1990, Behav Pharmacol, V1, P355
[5]   CHANGES IN HEROIN SELF-ADMINISTRATION BY A RHESUS-MONKEY AFTER MORPHINE IMMUNIZATION [J].
BONESE, KF ;
WAINER, BH ;
FITCH, FW ;
ROTHBERG, RM ;
SCHUSTER, CR .
NATURE, 1974, 252 (5485) :708-710
[6]   Dose-response cocaine pharmacokinetics and metabolite profile following intravenous administration and arterial sampling in unanesthetized, freely moving male rats [J].
Booze, RM ;
Lehner, AF ;
Wallace, DR ;
Welch, MA ;
Mactutus, CF .
NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 1997, 19 (01) :7-15
[7]  
CAINE SB, 1994, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V270, P209
[8]   SUPPRESSION OF PSYCHOACTIVE EFFECTS OF COCAINE BY ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION [J].
CARRERA, MRA ;
ASHLEY, JA ;
PARSONS, LH ;
WIRSCHING, P ;
KOOB, GF ;
JANDA, KD .
NATURE, 1995, 378 (6558) :727-730
[9]  
CARROLL FI, 1994, PHARM NEWS, V1, P11
[10]   Cocaine-induced cardiovascular effects: Lack of evidence for a central nervous system site of action based on hemodynamic studies with cocaine methiodide [J].
Dickerson, LW ;
Rodak, DJ ;
Kuhn, FE ;
Wahlstrom, SK ;
Tessel, RE ;
Visner, MS ;
Schaer, GL ;
Gillis, RA .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 33 (01) :36-42