Validation of the Aphasic Depression Rating Scale

被引:94
作者
Benaim, C [1 ]
Cailly, B
Perennou, D
Pelissier, J
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Nimes, Serv Reeduc Neurol, Ctr Helio Marin, F-30240 Le Grau Du Roi, France
[2] Hop Caremeau, Ctr Hosp Univ Nimes, Serv Psychiat A, Nimes, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Reeduc, Serv Reeduc Neurol, Dijon, France
关键词
depression; aphasia; stroke assessment; reproducibility of results;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000130591.95710.20
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-The Aphasic Depression Rating Scale (ADRS) was developed to detect and measure depression in aphasic patients during the subacute stage of stroke. Methods-Six experts selected an initial sampling of behavioral items from existing depression rating scales. Stroke patients (aphasic and nonaphasic) were assessed with these items by the rehabilitation staff, with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) for nonaphasic patients only, by a psychiatrist, and by the rehabilitation staff with Visual Analog Scales (VAS). A second item selection was conducted after a regression algorithm was run including VAS as independent variables (criterion validity) and after their factorial structure was analyzed with a principal component analysis (factorial validity). The construct validity was evaluated with respect to the other depression assessments. A threshold for the diagnosis of depression was computed with respect to the psychiatrist's diagnosis. Interrater and test-retest reliability were assessed in 2 additional groups of aphasic patients. Results-Eighty patients participated in the study (59 aphasic). Fifteen behavioral items from existing depression rating scales were selected, and 9 were retained after the validation process. ADRS correlated highly with VAS and HDRS (r=0.60 to 0.78, P=10(-4) to 10(-6)). With respect to the psychiatrist's diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of ADRS were 0.83 and 0.71, respectively, when the threshold was set at 9/32. Its factorial structure was comparable to HDRS structure. Interrater and test-retest reliability were high (average kappa coefficient of the 9 items=0.69). Conclusions-ADRS is a valid, reliable, sensitive, and specific tool for the evaluation of depression in aphasic patients during the stroke subacute phase.
引用
收藏
页码:1692 / 1696
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Measurement of mood states in stroke patients: Validation of the visual analog mood scales [J].
Arruda, JE ;
Stern, RA ;
Somerville, JA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (06) :676-680
[2]  
Dantchev N, 1998, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V59, P19
[3]  
Gainotti G, 1972, Cortex, V8, P41
[4]  
HAMILTON M, 1967, BRIT J SOC CLIN PSYC, V6, P278, DOI [10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x, DOI 10.1111/J.2044-8260.1967.TB00530.X]
[5]  
Lincoln N. B., 2000, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V1, P88, DOI DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000130591.95710.20
[6]  
McDowell I., 1987, MEASURING HLTH GUIDE
[7]  
McHenry C. E., 1978, J Royal Stat Soc. C (App Stat), V27, P291
[8]   NEW DEPRESSION SCALE DESIGNED TO BE SENSITIVE TO CHANGE [J].
MONTGOMERY, SA ;
ASBERG, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1979, 134 (APR) :382-389
[9]   Can stroke patients use visual analogue scales? [J].
Price, CIM ;
Curless, RH ;
Rodgers, H .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (07) :1357-1361
[10]  
Stern Robert A., 1999, Seminars in Speech and Language, V20, P33, DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1064007