Optimization of coplanar six-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate

被引:30
作者
Bedford, JL
Khoo, VS
Webb, S
Dearnaley, DP
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, Acad Dept Radiotherapy & Oncol, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Surrey, England
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2000年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
conformal radiotherapy; prostate cancer; treatment planning; optimization; dose-volume histogram;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00358-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the optimal coplanar treatment technique for six-field conformal radiotherapy of prostate only (PO) or prostate plus seminal vesicles (PSV). Methods and Materials: A series of 6-MV six-field coplanar treatment plans were created for PO and PSV volumes in 10 patients prescribed to both 64 and 74 Gy, All plans consisted of laterally-symmetric anterior oblique, lateral, and posterior oblique fields, The posterior oblique fields were varied through 20-45 degrees relative to the lateral fields, and for each of these angles, the anterior oblique fields were varied through 25-65 degrees relative to lateral. The plans were compared by means of rectal volumes irradiated to 80% or more of the prescribed dose (V-80); normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for rectum, bladder, and femoral heads; and tumor control probability (TCP), Femoral head tolerance was designated as 52 Gy to no more than 10% volume. Results: For the PO group, anterior oblique fields at 50 degrees from lateral and posterior oblique fields at 25 degrees from lateral produced the lowest V-80, together with femoral head doses which were appropriate for most patients (V-80 = 24.4 +/- 5.3 % [1 SD]), Compared to a commonly-used six-field (reference) plan with both anterior and posterior oblique fields at 35 degrees from lateral (V-80 = 26.3 +/- 5.9%), this represented an improvement (p = 0.001), For the PSV group, the optimal anterior and posterior oblique fields were at 65 degrees and 30 degrees from lateral, respectively (V-80 47.5 +/- 6.3%), Relative to the reference plan (V-80 = 49.4 +/- 5.6%), this was a marginal improvement (p = 0.07). Conclusion: The optimized six-field plans provide increased rectal sparing at both standard and escalated doses. Moreover, the gain in TCP resulting from dose escalation can be achieved with a smaller increase in rectal NTCP using the optimized six-field plans. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 238
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Three dimensional comparison of blocked arcs vs four and six field conformal treatment of the prostate [J].
Akazawa, PF ;
Roach, M ;
Pickett, B ;
Purser, P ;
Parkinson, D ;
Rathbun, C ;
Margolis, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1996, 41 (01) :83-88
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 11 INT C US COMP R
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT UNION CANC UICC
[4]  
[Anonymous], RAD RES S
[5]   A digital method for computing target margins in radiotherapy [J].
Bedford, JL ;
Shentall, GS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (02) :224-231
[6]   A comparison of coplanar four-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate [J].
Bedford, JL ;
Khoo, VS ;
Oldham, M ;
Dearnaley, DP ;
Webb, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 51 (03) :225-235
[7]   LATE RECTAL BLEEDING FOLLOWING COMBINED X-RAY AND PROTON HIGH-DOSE IRRADIATION FOR PATIENTS WITH STAGES T3-T4 PROSTATE CARCINOMA [J].
BENK, VA ;
ADAMS, JA ;
SHIPLEY, WU ;
URIE, MM ;
MCMANUS, PL ;
EFIRD, JT ;
WILLETT, CG ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 26 (03) :551-557
[8]   DECOMPOSITION OF PENCIL BEAM KERNELS FOR FAST DOSE CALCULATIONS IN 3-DIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING [J].
BORTFELD, T ;
SCHLEGEL, W ;
RHEIN, B .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (02) :311-318
[9]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[10]   Hip stiffness following mixed conformal neutron and photon radiotherapy: A dose-volume relationship [J].
Chuba, PJ ;
Sharma, R ;
Yudelev, M ;
Duclos, M ;
Shamsa, F ;
Giacalone, S ;
Orton, CG ;
Maughan, RL ;
Forman, JD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (04) :693-699