Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: Description of a new technique

被引:21
作者
Gill, IS
Desai, MM
Kaouk, JH
Wani, K
Desai, MR
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Urol, Sect Laparoscop & Minimally Invas Surg, Inst Urol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Muljibhai Patel Urol Hosp, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
关键词
ureter; ureteral obstruction; endoscopy; kidney;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64304-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We present a novel technique of percutaneous endopyeloplasty, in which the conventional longitudinal endopyelotomy incision is precisely sutured in a horizontal Heineke-Mikulicz fashion through the solitary percutaneous tract, thus, achieving Fenger-plasty type of repair of the ureteropelvic junction. Materials and Methods: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty was performed in 9 patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Essential steps of our novel technique include retrograde placement of a ureteral catheter over a guide wire into the renal pelvis, establishing conventional percutaneous renal access, creating a conventional longitudinal endopyelotomy incision and performing full-thickness horizontal suturing of the endopyelotomy incision in Heineke-Mikulicz fashion. Suturing was done using the novel 5 mm. Sew Right 5 SR laparoscopic suturing device (LSI Solutions, Rochester, New York) passed through the nephroscope. Results: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty was technically successful in all 9 patients. Mean total operative time was 100.8 minutes (range 62 to 140.), including an endopyeloplasty suturing time of 26.6 minutes (range 14 to 54.). We placed I to 4 endopyeloplasty sutures per case. Blood loss was minimal, mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (range 2 to 3) and the ureteral Double-J stent (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) was removed in 2 weeks. At a mean followup of 4 months all operated kidneys showed relief of obstruction, as confirmed by clinical improvement in symptoms and improved renal drainage on excretory urography and diuretic renography. Conclusions: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty is technically feasible, safe and effective. Potential advantages over conventional endopyelotomy include wider caliber reconstruction of the ureteropelvic junction, full-thickness healing with primary intent, minimal urinary extravasation and shorter stenting duration. To our knowledge the initial clinical experience is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:2097 / 2102
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Andriole S. J., 2000, Cutter IT Journal, V13, P4
[2]   Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome [J].
Bauer, JJ ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Moore, RG ;
Chen, RN ;
Iverson, AJ ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :692-695
[3]  
Davis D, 1943, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V76, P513
[4]  
DESAI MM, UNPUB PERCUTANEOUS E
[5]   Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: A 12-year perspective [J].
Gupta, M ;
Tuncay, OL ;
Smith, AD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) :1613-1618
[6]   ENDOPYELOTOMY VERSUS OPEN PYELOPLASTY - COMPARISON IN 88 PATIENTS [J].
KARLIN, GS ;
BADLANI, GH ;
SMITH, AD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 140 (03) :476-478
[7]   RESULTS OF 212 CONSECUTIVE ENDOPYELOTOMIES - AN 8-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
MOTOLA, JA ;
BADLANI, GH ;
SMITH, AD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (03) :453-456
[8]   New technique in managing ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Percutaneous endoscopic pyeloplasty [J].
Oshinsky, GS ;
Jarrett, TW ;
Smith, AD .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (02) :147-151
[9]   HISTOLOGY OF URETER AFTER UNSUCCESSFUL ENDOSCOPIC INTUBATED INCISION [J].
SCHMELLER, N ;
LEITL, F ;
ARNHOLDT, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (02) :450-452