Insulin resistance is not a major determinant of low-density lipoprotein particle size

被引:19
作者
Slyper, AH
Zvereva, S
Schectman, G
Hoffmann, RG
Mueller, RA
Walker, JA
机构
[1] MED COLL WISCONSIN,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[2] ST LUKES HOSP,MILWAUKEE,WI 53215
来源
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL | 1997年 / 46卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90230-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The relationship between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) peak particle diameter and insulin sensitivity, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) + intermediate-density lipoprotein (LDL) triglyceride, cholesterol, and apoprotein B, postprandial lipemia, and LDL + high-density lipoprotein (HDL) triglyceride was assessed. The subjects were 101 healthy males aged 15 to 45 years. Sixty-one subjects (60.4%) were offspring of a parent with coronary artery disease before age 60, and 40 subjects (39.6%) had no parental history of coronary artery disease. LDL peak particle diameter was measured following polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. An insulin sensitivity index (S-I) was determined from a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test using a minimal modeling method. A fat tolerance test was performed with a test meal containing 70 g/m(2) fat, with triglyceride concentrations measured hourly for 12 hours. LDL peak particle diameter was significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (r = -.282, P < .01), waist to hip ratio (r = -.291, P < .01), fasting triglyceride (logarithmically [log] transformed) (r = -.566, P < .001), area under the postprandial triglyceride curve (log transformed) (r = -.562, P < .001), VLDL + IDL triglyceride (log transformed) (r = -.462, P < .001), VLDL + IDL cholesterol (log transformed) (r = -.477, P < .001), VLDL + IDL apoprotein B (log transformed) (r = -.321, P < .001), LDL + HDL triglyceride (log transformed) (r = .583, P < .001), and HDL cholesterol (r = .347, P < .001), but there was no significant correlation with S-I. Using stepwise regression analysis, LDL + HDL triglyceride showed the strongest relationship to LDL peak particle diameter, accounting for 34% of the variation in size. S-I was not an independent predictor of LDL particle size. In conclusion, insulin sensitivity appears to have little influence on LDL particle size. The importance of LDL + HDL triglyceride should be considered a preliminary finding warranting verification in this and other populations. Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1280
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Current Opinion in Lipidology
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications
[3]  
ATTAI N, 1995, ATHEROSCLEROSIS, V113, P197
[4]  
AUSTIN MA, 1988, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V260, P1917
[5]   ATHEROGENIC LIPOPROTEIN PHENOTYPE - A PROPOSED GENETIC-MARKER FOR CORONARY HEART-DISEASE RISK [J].
AUSTIN, MA ;
KING, MC ;
VRANIZAN, KM ;
KRAUSS, RM .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (02) :495-506
[6]   LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBCLASS PHENOTYPES AND FAMILIAL COMBINED HYPERLIPIDEMIA [J].
AUSTIN, MA .
DIABETES-METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1991, 7 (03) :173-177
[7]   LARGE BUOYANT LDL-LIKE PARTICLES IN HEPATIC LIPASE DEFICIENCY [J].
AUWERX, JH ;
MARZETTA, CA ;
HOKANSON, JE ;
BRUNZELL, JD .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, 1989, 9 (03) :319-325
[8]  
BERGMAN RN, 1986, METHODS DIABETES RES, V2
[9]   LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLE-SIZE AND CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE [J].
CAMPOS, H ;
GENEST, JJ ;
BLIJLEVENS, E ;
MCNAMARA, JR ;
JENNER, JL ;
ORDOVAS, JM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
SCHAEFER, EJ .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 1992, 12 (02) :187-195
[10]   LDL PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION - RESULTS FROM THE FRAMINGHAM OFFSPRING STUDY [J].
CAMPOS, H ;
BLIJLEVENS, E ;
MCNAMARA, JR ;
ORDOVAS, JM ;
POSNER, BM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
CASTELLI, WP ;
SCHAEFER, EJ .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 1992, 12 (12) :1410-1419