Rapid, ultra-sensitive detection of gas phase elemental mercury under atmospheric conditions using sequential two-photon laser induced fluorescence

被引:22
作者
Bauer, D [1 ]
Campuzano-Jost, P [1 ]
Hynes, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Rosenstiel Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Div Marine & Atmospher Chem, Miami, FL 33149 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | 2002年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1039/b111688f
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We have examined the sensitivity of sequential two photon laser induced fluorescence (LIF) detection of elemental mercury, Hg(0) in the gas phase. The most sensitive approach involves an initial laser excitation of the 6(3)p(1)-6(1)S(0) transition at 253.7 nm, followed by excitation with a second laser to the 7(1)S(0) level. Blue shifted fluorescence is observed on the 6(1)P(1)-6(1)S(0) transition at 184.9 nm. The excitation scheme; involving sequential excitation of two atomic transitions, followed by detection of the emission from a third is extremely specific and precludes detection of anything other than atomic mercury. Using our 10 Hz laser system we have achieved a detection sensitivity of 0.1 ng m(-3) at a sampling rate of 0.1 Hz, t.e. averaging 100 laser shots at a pressure of one atmosphere in air. At low concentrations we sampled simultaneously with an automated mercury analyzer (Tekran 2537A), to ensure accuracy. We have examined the linearity of the technique, generating flows containing mercury concentrations between 1 and 10000 ng m(-3) using a permeation tube and dynamic dilution, but relying on the concentrations given by the Tekran at low levels and the concentration calculated from dilution at high levels. We find that the detection is linear over the five orders of magnitude that we were able to vary the concentration. Our measured detection limits in He and Ar are much lower as these gases are inefficient fluorescence quenchers.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 343
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bauer D. S. G., UNPUB
[2]   Trace determination of mercury: A review [J].
Clevenger, WL ;
Smith, BW ;
Winefordner, JD .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 27 (01) :1-26
[3]   International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland [J].
Ebinghaus, R ;
Jennings, SG ;
Schroeder, WH ;
Berg, T ;
Donaghy, T ;
Guentzel, J ;
Kenny, C ;
Kock, HH ;
Kvietkus, K ;
Landing, W ;
Mühleck, T ;
Munthe, J ;
Prestbo, EM ;
Schneeberger, D ;
Slemr, F ;
Sommar, J ;
Urba, A ;
Wallschläger, D ;
Xiao, Z .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (18) :3063-3073
[4]   ATMOSPHERIC ATOMIC MERCURY MONITORING USING DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION LIDAR TECHNIQUES [J].
EDNER, H ;
FARIS, GW ;
SUNESSON, A ;
SVANBERG, S .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1989, 28 (05) :921-930
[5]   IS MERCURY INCREASING IN THE ATMOSPHERE - THE NEED FOR AN ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY NETWORK (AMNET) [J].
FITZGERALD, WF .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 80 (1-4) :245-254
[6]   Assessing the contribution of natural sources to the global mercury cycle: The importance of intercomparing dynamic flux measurements [J].
Gustin, MS ;
Lindberg, SE .
FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 366 (05) :417-422
[7]   TRACE GAS-DETECTION WITH CAVITY RING DOWN SPECTROSCOPY [J].
JONGMA, RT ;
BOOGAARTS, MGH ;
HOLLEMAN, I ;
MEIJER, G .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1995, 66 (04) :2821-2828
[8]  
LANDIS M, 2000, P EPA C METH MEAS ME
[9]   The chemistry of atmospheric mercury: a review [J].
Lin, CJ ;
Pehkonen, SO .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (13) :2067-2079