The DAMASK trial protocol: a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee

被引:16
作者
Brealey, Stephen D.
Atwell, Christine
Bryan, Stirling
Coulton, Simon
Cox, Helen
Cross, Ben
Fylan, Fiona
Garratt, Andrew
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Gillan, Maureen G. C.
Hendry, Maggie
Hood, Kerenza
Houston, Helen
King, David
Morton, Veronica
Orchard, Jo
Robling, Michael
T Russell, Ian
Torgerson, David
Wadsworth, Valerie
Wilkinson, Clare
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York Trials Unit, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Cardiff Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Cardiff CF14 4YS, Wales
[3] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[4] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Dept Psychol, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth Management & Hlth Ecol, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Radiol, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[7] Cardiff Univ Sch Med, N Wales Clin Sch, Wrexham LL13 7YP, Wales
[8] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci Res, SE Wales Trials Unit, Cardiff CF14 4YS, Wales
[9] York Hosp, Xray Dept, York YO31 8HE, N Yorkshire, England
[10] Univ Wales, Inst Med & Social Care Res, Bangor LL57 2AS, Gwynedd, Wales
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-6-133
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Though new technologies like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be accurate, they often diffuse into practice before thorough assessment of their value in diagnosis and management, and of their effects on patient outcome and costs. MRI of the knee is a common investigation despite concern that it is not always appropriate. There is wide variation in general practitioners (GPs) access to, and use of MRI, and in the associated costs. The objective of this study was to resolve uncertainty whether GPs should refer patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee for MRI or to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care. Methods/Design: The design consisted of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial with two parallel groups and concomitant economic evaluation. Patients presenting in general practice with suspected internal derangement of the knee and for whom their GP was considering referral to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care were eligible for inclusion. Within practices, GPs or practice nurses randomised eligible and consenting participants to the local radiology department for an MRI examination, or for consultation with an orthopaedic specialist. To ensure that the waiting time from GP consultation to orthopaedic appointment was similar for both trial arms, GPs made a provisional referral to orthopaedics when requesting the MRI examination. Thus we evaluated the more appropriate sequence of events independent of variations in waiting times. Follow up of participants was by postal questionnaires at six, twelve and 24 months after randomisation. This was to ensure that the evaluation covered all events up to and including arthroscopy. Discussion: The DAMASK trial should make a major contribution to the development of evidence-based partnerships between primary and secondary care professionals and inform the debate when MRI should enter the diagnostic pathway.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BURD DIS DISC DOC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
[3]   Direct access MRI for general practitioners - Influence on patient management [J].
Apthorp, LA ;
Daly, CA ;
Morrison, ID ;
Field, S .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 53 (01) :58-60
[4]  
Barrett A, 2005, BRIT MED J, V331, P256
[5]  
Briggs A, 1998, J Health Serv Res Policy, V3, P233
[6]  
Brown H., 2006, Applied mixed models in medicine, V2nd
[7]  
Bryan S., 2001, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V5, P27
[8]  
Chawda SJ, 1997, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V47, P575
[9]  
Couchman GR, 2005, MED SCI MONITOR, V11, pMT19
[10]  
*DEP HLTH, DEP HLTH HOSP ACT ST