Factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Japanese psychiatric outpatient and student populations

被引:90
作者
Matsudaira, Tomomi [1 ]
Igarashi, Hiromi [1 ]
Kikuchi, Hiroyoshi [2 ]
Kano, Rikihachiro [2 ]
Mitoma, Hiroshi [3 ]
Ohuchi, Kiyoshi [4 ]
Kitamura, Toshinori [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Clin Behav Sci Psychol Med, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Tokyo Int Univ, Grad Sch Clin Psychol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1690051, Japan
[3] Mitoma Clin, Kumamoto 8620972, Japan
[4] Heartful Clin, Kumamoto 8620926, Japan
关键词
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; PSYCHOMETRIC DATA; CES-D; VALIDATION; CANCER; HADS; INDIVIDUALS; PERSONALITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-7-42
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Background: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a common screening instrument excluding somatic symptoms of depression and anxiety, but previous studies have reported inconsistencies of its factor structure. The construct validity of the Japanese version of the HADS has yet to be reported. To examine the factor structure of the HADS in a Japanese population is needed. Methods: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted in the combined data of 408 psychiatric outpatients and 1069 undergraduate students. The data pool was randomly split in half for a cross validation. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on one half of the data, and the fitness of the plausible model was examined in the other half of the data using a confirmatory factor analysis. Simultaneous multi-group analyses between the subgroups (outpatients vs. students, and men vs. women) were subsequently conducted. Results: A two-factor model where items 6 and 7 had dual loadings was supported. These factors were interpreted as reflecting anxiety and depression. Item 10 showed low contributions to both of the factors. Simultaneous multi-group analyses indicated a factor pattern stability across the subgroups. Conclusion: The Japanese version of HADS indicated good factorial validity in our samples. However, ambiguous wording of item 7 should be clarified in future revisions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]
American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, V4th ed., DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[3]
THE HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE - HOMOGENEITY OF THE SUBSCALES [J].
ANDERSSON, E .
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1993, 21 (03) :197-204
[4]
[Anonymous], 1999, SPSS 10 0 WIND
[5]
Arbuckle J.L., 1999, AMOS 40 USERS GUIDE
[6]
Barbee J G, 1998, Ann Clin Psychiatry, V10, P15, DOI 10.3109/10401239809148814
[7]
Barth J., 2005, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, V3, P15, DOI DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-3-15
[8]
Beck A., 1996, MANUAL BECK DEPRESSI
[9]
Bedford A, 1997, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V23, P473
[10]
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588