Automatic calculation of a modified APACHE II score using a patient data management system (PDMS)

被引:18
作者
Junger, A
Böttger, S
Engel, J
Benson, M
Michel, A
Röhrig, R
Jost, A
Hempelmann, G
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Giessen, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Giessen, Dept Med & Adm Data Proc, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
关键词
data management system; computerized patient record; risk score; APACHE score; risk factors;
D O I
10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00014-X
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate a fully automated and modified APACHE II score calculation exclusively based on routine data supplied by patient data management system, the ICUData, and to assess the predictive performance of this score using analysis of discrimination and calibration at an operative ICU. Method: SQL scripts (calculation programs) were developed to calculate the scores of 524 patients who stayed at the ICU between April 1st, 1999 and March 31st, 2000. The calculation programs considered unavailable data as 'not pathological'. The main outcome measure was survival status at ICU discharge. The discriminative power on mortality of this modified APACHE II score was checked with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Calibration was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Results: The 459 survivors had an average APACHE score of 17.8 +/- 5.3. The score of the 65 deceased patients averaged 22.7 +/- 4.6. The area under the ROC curve of 0.790 was significantly > 0.5 (P < 0.01) and had a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.712-0.825. The goodness-of-fit test showed a good calibration (H = 4.89, P = 0.70, dof 7, C = 6.96, P = 0.541, dof 8). Conclusion: A prediction model based on completely automatically calculated 'modified APACHE II scores' can be constructed using data collected with PDMS. However, due to differences in the patient collective and methods used, the :results need validation and can only be partially compared to results from other studies. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 157
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF 2 SEVERITY-OF-DISEASE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS (APACHE-II AND APACHE-III) IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
BEIN, T ;
FROHLICH, D ;
FREY, A ;
METZ, C ;
TAEGER, K .
ANAESTHESIST, 1995, 44 (01) :37-42
[2]   Clinical and practical requirements of online software for anesthesia documentation - an experience report [J].
Benson, M ;
Junger, A ;
Quinzio, L ;
Fuchs, C ;
Sciuk, G ;
Michel, A ;
Marquardt, K ;
Hempelmann, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2000, 57 (2-3) :155-164
[3]   The use of intensive care information systems alters outcome prediction [J].
Bosman, RJ ;
van Straaten, HMO ;
Zandstra, DF .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (09) :953-958
[4]   Interobserver variability in data collection of the APACHE II score in teaching and community hospitals [J].
Chen, LM ;
Martin, CM ;
Morrison, TL ;
Sibbald, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (09) :1999-2004
[5]   Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome [J].
Cho, DY ;
Wang, YC .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (01) :77-84
[6]   THE COMPUTERIZED BURN UNIT - EXPERIENCE WITH A PATIENT DATA MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM [J].
HAMMOND, J ;
WARD, CG ;
JOHNSON, M ;
VARAS, R ;
MARCIAL, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1989, 6 (02) :87-89
[7]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[8]  
Hosmer D. W., 1989, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES, DOI DOI 10.1097/00019514-200604000-00003
[9]  
HUFF SM, 1994, P ANN S COMP APPL ME, V15, P271
[10]  
Kleen M, 2000, ANAESTHESIST, V49, P153