Newsvendor model for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns

被引:188
作者
Du, Shaofu [1 ]
Nie, Tengfei [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Chengbin [2 ]
Yu, Yugang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Ecole Cent Paris, Lab Genie Ind, Chatenay Malabry, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
supply chain management; fairness concern; status seeking; Nash bargaining; behavioral operations; BANDWIDTH ALLOCATION; STATUS-SEEKING; GAME-THEORY; COORDINATION; PREFERENCES; CONTRACTS; ECONOMICS; BEHAVIOR; INCOME;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2014.895446
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The paper investigates newsvendor problem for a dyadic supply chain in which both the supplier and the retailer have the preference of status-seeking with fairness concerns. Nash bargaining solution is introduced as the fairness reference point and equilibrium results are derived. The effects of fairness-concerned status-seeking behaviors on optimal decisions as well as channel efficiency are further analyzed. It is shown that the channel efficiency will decrease because of such behavioral preference. The retailer's share will be larger when the supplier concerns fairness less, and the supplier's sensitivity to fairness plays a relatively more important role for the channel efficiency. Additionally, another interesting managerial insight is concluded that fairness concerns will not change the status of channel coordination in certain conditions. More specifically, those contracts able (unable) to coordinate fairness-neutral supply chain, based on affine transformations with scale factors within certain ranges, still succeed (fail) to coordinate the fairness-concerned. Furthermore, several insights on bargaining powers are given as well.
引用
收藏
页码:5070 / 5085
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   THE NASH BARGAINING SOLUTION IN ECONOMIC MODELING [J].
BINMORE, K ;
RUBINSTEIN, A ;
WOLINSKY, A .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :176-188
[2]  
BOLTON GE, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1096
[3]  
Cachon GP, 2003, HDBK OPER R, V11, P229, DOI 10.1016/s0927-0507(03)11006-7
[4]   ULTIMATUMS, DICTATORS AND MANNERS [J].
CAMERER, C ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (02) :209-219
[5]   Satisfaction and comparison income [J].
Clark, AE ;
Oswald, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1996, 61 (03) :359-381
[6]   Fairness and channel coordination [J].
Cui, Tony Haitao ;
Raju, Jagmohan S. ;
Zhang, Z. John .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (08) :1303-1314
[7]  
Dash Wu D, 2011, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V58, P1659
[8]   Estimating the Influence of Fairness on Bargaining Behavior [J].
De Bruyn, Arnaud ;
Bolton, Gary E. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (10) :1774-1791
[9]  
Du SF, 2011, ANN OPERATIONS RES
[10]  
Easterlin R. A., 1974, NATIONS HOUSEHOLDS E, P89, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7, 10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7]