Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation

被引:254
作者
Alcalde, Juan [1 ]
Flude, Stephanie [2 ]
Wilkinson, Mark [2 ]
Johnson, Gareth [2 ]
Edlmann, Katriona [2 ]
Bond, Clare E. [1 ]
Scott, Vivian [2 ]
Gilfillan, Stuart M. V. [2 ]
Ogaya, Xenia [3 ]
Haszeldine, R. Stuart [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Kings Coll, Sch Geosci, Geol & Petr Geol, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, James Hutton Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Barcelona, Inst GEOMODELS, Dept Dinam Terra Ocea, C Marti i Franques S-N, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
来源
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2018年 / 9卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
GAS DISTRICT 4; CARBON-STORAGE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; RESIDUAL SATURATION; CALIFORNIA OIL; LEAKAGE RATES; INJECTION; TRANSPORT; DIOXIDE; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-018-04423-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) can help nations meet their Paris CO2 reduction commitments cost-effectively. However, lack of confidence in geologic CO2 storage security remains a barrier to CCS implementation. Here we present a numerical program that calculates CO2 storage security and leakage to the atmosphere over 10,000 years. This combines quantitative estimates of geological subsurface CO2 retention, and of surface CO2 leakage. We calculate that realistically well-regulated storage in regions with moderate well densities has a 50% probability that leakage remains below 0.0008% per year, with over 98% of the injected CO2 retained in the subsurface over 10,000 years. An unrealistic scenario, where CO2 storage is inadequately regulated, estimates that more than 78% will be retained over 10,000 years. Our modelling results suggest that geological storage of CO2 can be a secure climate change mitigation option, but we note that long-term behaviour of CO2 in the subsurface remains a key uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GREENHOUSE GAS CONTR, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50067-7
[2]  
[Anonymous], WORLD EN OUTL 2017 S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Fifth assessment report (AR5). Synthesis Report
[4]   Fate of fossil fuel CO2 in geologic time -: art. no. C09S05 [J].
Archer, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2005, 110 (C9) :1-6
[5]   Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data [J].
Arts, R ;
Eiken, O ;
Chadwick, A ;
Zweigel, P ;
van der Meer, L ;
Zinszner, B .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (9-10) :1383-1392
[6]   Public preferences to CCS: How does it change across countries? [J].
Ashworth, Peta ;
Einsiedel, Edna ;
Howell, Rhys ;
Brunsting, Suzanne ;
Boughen, Naomi ;
Boyd, Amanda ;
Shackley, Simon ;
Van Bree, Bas ;
Jeanneret, Talia ;
Stenner, Karen ;
Medlock, Jennifer ;
Mabon, Leslie ;
Feenstra, C. F. J. ;
Hekkenberg, Michiel .
GHGT-11, 2013, 37 :7410-7418
[7]   Review and implications of relative permeability of CO2/brine systems and residual trapping of CO2 [J].
Burnside, N. M. ;
Naylor, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 23 :1-11
[8]   Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years Of CO2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA [J].
Carey, J. William ;
Wigand, Marcus ;
Chipera, Steve J. ;
WoldeGabriel, Giday ;
Pawar, Rajesh ;
Lichtner, Peter C. ;
Wehner, Scott C. ;
Raines, Michael A. ;
Guthrie, George D., Jr. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (01) :75-85
[9]   Review: Role of chemistry, mechanics, and transport on well integrity in CO2 storage environments [J].
Carroll, Susan ;
Carey, J. William ;
Dzombak, David ;
Huerta, Nicolas J. ;
Li, Li ;
Richard, Tom ;
Um, Wooyong ;
Walsh, Stuart D. C. ;
Zhang, Liwei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 49 :149-160
[10]   Field-scale application of a semi-analytical model for estimation of CO2 and brine leakage along old wells [J].
Celia, Michael A. ;
Nordbotten, Jan M. ;
Court, Benjamin ;
Dobossy, Mark ;
Bachu, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (02) :257-269