Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis

被引:150
作者
Safian, Robert D.
Bresnahan, John F.
Jaff, Michael R.
Foster, Malcolm
Bacharach, J. Michael
Maini, Brijeshwar
Turco, Mark
Myla, Subbarao
Eles, Gustav
Ansel, Gary M.
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Ctr Heart, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
[4] Baptist Heart Inst, Nashville, TN USA
[5] N Cent Heart Hosp S Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[6] Harrisburg Hosp, Pinnacle Hlth, Harrisburg, PA USA
[7] Washington Adventist Hosp, Washington, DC USA
[8] Hoag Mem Hosp, Newport Beach, CA USA
[9] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[10] Riverside Methodist Hosp, Columbus, OH 43214 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.076
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of carotid artery stenting with a unique distal embolic protection system in high-risk patients with severe carotid stenosis. BACKGROUND Previous studies suggest that some patients with carotid stenosis and serious comorbid conditions are at high risk for carotid endarterectomy, and may be safely treated by carotid artery stenting. METHODS A prospective non-randomized multicenter registry of 419 patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy was conducted between April 2004 and October 2004. Carotid artery stenting was performed with the Protege Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent and the SPIDER Embolic Protection System (ev3 Inc., Plymouth, Minnesota). Aspirin and clopidogrel were prescribed at least 24 h before and three months after revascularization. The primary outcome was the combined incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days after intervention, including death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. A secondary outcome was the technical success, defined as successful deployment of all devices, filter retrieval, and final diameter stenosis < 50%. RESULTS Technical success was achieved in 408 of 419 patients (97.4%). The primary end point was observed in 26 patients (6.2%), including death in 8 (1.9%), nonfatal stroke in 14 (3.3%), and nonfatal myocardial infarction in 4 (1%). Independent predictors of death or stroke at 30 days included duration of filter deployment, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and baseline renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS For some patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection is a reasonable alternative for revascularization.
引用
收藏
页码:2384 / 2389
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Biller J, 1998, CIRCULATION, V97, P501
[2]  
Halliday A, 2004, LANCET, V363, P1491
[3]   Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase [J].
Hobson, RW ;
Howard, VJ ;
Roubin, GS ;
Brott, TG ;
Ferguson, RD ;
Popma, JJ ;
Graham, DL ;
Howard, G .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 40 (06) :1106-1110
[4]   Preprocedural risk stratification: Identifying an appropriate population for carotid stenting [J].
Ouriel, K ;
Hertzer, NR ;
Beven, EG ;
O'Hara, P ;
Krajewski, LP ;
Clair, DG ;
Greenberg, RK ;
Sarac, TP ;
Olin, JW ;
Yadav, JS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (04) :728-732
[5]   Systematic review of the risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis [J].
Rothwell, PM ;
Slattery, J ;
Warlow, CP .
STROKE, 1996, 27 (02) :260-265
[6]   Carotid stenting with a new system for distal embolic protection and stenting in high-risk patients: The carotid revascularization with ev3 Arterial Technology Evolution (CREATE) feasibility [J].
Safian, RD ;
Bacharach, JM ;
Ansel, GM ;
Criado, FJ .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (01) :1-6
[7]  
Slattery J, 1996, LANCET, V347, P1591
[8]  
TAYLOR DW, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V325, P445
[9]   ENDARTERECTOMY FOR ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS [J].
WALKER, MD ;
MARLER, JR ;
GOLDSTEIN, M ;
GRADY, PA ;
TOOLE, JF ;
BAKER, WH ;
CASTALDO, JE ;
CHAMBLESS, LE ;
MOORE, WS ;
ROBERTSON, JT ;
YOUNG, B ;
HOWARD, VJ ;
PURVIS, S ;
VERNON, DD ;
NEEDHAM, K ;
BECK, P ;
DOZIER, M ;
LEFKOWITZ, DS ;
HOWARD, G ;
CROUSE, JR ;
HERRINGTON, DM ;
FURBERG, CD ;
ESSICK, K ;
HICKS, RM ;
NELSON, JJ ;
BALL, W ;
BLAND, E ;
CONDON, S ;
ELLIOTT, T ;
GRIZZLE, JE ;
HAYES, D ;
HENLEY, S ;
JOHNSON, J ;
LOCKLEAR, J ;
MISCH, MS ;
PATON, CC ;
SCHWARTZ, S ;
WALKER, C ;
WILLIAMS, OD ;
EASTON, JD ;
GOLDSTONE, J ;
HALLENBECK, JM ;
HOFF, JT ;
KARP, HR ;
KRONMAL, RA ;
BROTT, TG ;
TOMSICK, TA ;
BRODERICK, J ;
SAUERBECK, L ;
BLUM, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (18) :1421-1428
[10]   Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients [J].
Yadav, JS ;
Wholey, MH ;
Kuntz, RE ;
Fayad, P ;
Katzen, BT ;
Mishkel, GJ ;
Bajwa, TK ;
Whitlow, P ;
Strickman, NE ;
Jaff, MR ;
Popma, JJ ;
Snead, DB ;
Cutlip, DE ;
Firth, BG ;
Ouriel, K .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (15) :1493-1501