Effectiveness of an intervention promoting the female condom to patients at sexually transmitted disease clinics

被引:81
作者
Artz, L
Macaluso, M
Brill, I
Kelaghan, J
Austin, H
Fleenor, M
Robey, L
Hook, EW
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Int Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] NICHHD, Contracept & Reprod Evaluat Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Jefferson Cty Dept Hlth, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Madison Cty Hlth Dept, Huntsville, AL USA
[6] Univ Alabama, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.90.2.237
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study evaluated a behavioral intervention designed to promote female condoms and reduce unprotected sex among women at high risk for acquiring sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Methods. The effect of the intervention on barrier use was evaluated with a pretest-posttest design with 1159 female STD clinic patients. Results. Among participants with follow-up data, 79% used the female condom at least once and after multiple times. More than one third of those who completed the study used female condoms throughout follow-up. Use of barrier protection increased significantly after the intervention, and high use was maintained during a 6-month follow-up. To account for attrition, the use of protection by all subjects was projected under 3 conservative assumptions. The initial visit and termination visit projections suggest that use increased sharply after the intervention and declined during follow-up but remained elevated compared with the baseline. Conclusions. Many clients of public STD clinics will try, and some will continue, to use female condoms when they are promoted positively and when women are trained to use them correctly and to promote them to their partners. A behavioral intervention that promotes both female and male condoms can increase barrier use.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], VITAL HLTH STAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1963, EXPT QUASIEXPERIMENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], FEM COND REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], AIDS BEHAV
[5]  
Bounds W., 1992, British Journal of Family Planning, V18, P36
[6]   A TEST FOR SYMMETRY IN CONTINGENCY TABLES [J].
BOWKER, AH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1948, 43 (244) :572-574
[7]  
*CTR DIS CONTR PRE, 1996, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V8, P3
[8]   Differences between completers and early dropouts from 2 HIV intervention trials: A health belief approach to understanding prevention program attrition [J].
DiFranceisco, W ;
Kelly, JA ;
Sikkema, KJ ;
Somlai, AM ;
Murphy, DA ;
Stevenson, LY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (07) :1068-1073
[9]  
ELBASSEL N, 1996, 11 INT C AIDS JUL 7
[10]   BARRIERS TO CONDOM USE AND BARRIER METHOD PREFERENCES AMONG LOW-INCOME AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN [J].
ELDRIDGE, GD ;
LAWRENCE, JSS ;
LITTLE, CE ;
SHELBY, MC ;
BRASFIELD, TL .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 1995, 23 (01) :73-89