Ethanol as a cause of hypersensitivity reactions to alcoholic beverages

被引:25
作者
Ehlers, I
Hipler, UC
Zuberbier, T
Worm, M
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Dermatol & Allergy, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Dept Dermatol, D-6900 Jena, Germany
关键词
double-blind placebo-controlled challenge; ethanol; hypersensitivity; sulfidoleukotriene production;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.01457.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Adverse reactions after ingestion of alcoholic beverages are common. Metabolic differences in individuals and also the histamine content in alcoholic beverages have been implicated. By contrast pure ethanol has rarely been reported as a cause of hypersensitivity reactions and its mechanism has not been clarified yet. Objective To determine whether ethanol itself accounts for alcohol hypersensitivity in patients with anaphylactic reactions after alcohol intake. In search of possible pathomechanisms all patients were analysed by skin prick testing and sulfidoleukotriene production of peripheral leucocytes using ethanol and its metabolites. Methods Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges with a cumulated amount of 30 mL ethanol were performed in 12 adult patients with a positive history of adverse reactions after consumption of different alcoholic beverages. Skin prick tests and measurement of sulfidoleukotriene production were performed using different concentrations of ethanol and acetaldehyde from 50 to 1000 mm. Results Oral challenges with pure ethanol were positive in six out of eleven patients. All challenge-positive patients, but also four out of five challenge-negative patients, showed an increased sulfidoleukotriene production in-vitro compared with healthy controls. Skin prick tests using alcoholic beverages, ethanol, acetaldehyde and acetic acid were negative in all patients (12/12). Conclusion Our study shows that ethanol itself is a common causative factor in hypersensitivity reactions to alcoholic beverages. These reactions occur dose-dependent and a non-IgE-mediated pathomechanism is likely, because skin prick tests were negative in all cases. Increased sulfidoleukotriene production was determined in some patients, but is no reliable predictor. Therefore oral provocation tests remain indispensable in making the diagnosis of ethanol hypersensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1231 / 1235
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BARTOLOME B, 1995, ALLERGY, V50, P229
[2]  
Boehncke WH, 1996, CLIN EXP ALLERGY, V26, P1089, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1996.d01-410.x
[3]  
DEWECK AL, 1993, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN, V91, P93
[4]   Isolation and characterization of barley lipid transfer protein and protein Z as beer allergens [J].
García-Casado, G ;
Crespo, JF ;
Rodríguez, J ;
Salcedo, G .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 108 (04) :647-649
[5]   Exercise-induced anaphylaxis: Useful screening of food sensitization [J].
Guinnepain, MT ;
Eloit, C ;
Raffard, M ;
BrunetMoret, MJ ;
Rassemont, R ;
Laurent, J .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 77 (06) :491-496
[6]  
ISRAEL Y, 1992, MOL PHARMACOL, V42, P711
[7]   No correlation between wine intolerance and histamine content of wine [J].
Kanny, G ;
Gerbaux, V ;
Olszewski, A ;
Frémont, S ;
Empereur, F ;
Nabet, F ;
Cabanis, JC ;
Moneret-Vautrin, DA .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 107 (02) :375-378
[8]   TYPE-I HYPERSENSITIVITY TO BEER [J].
KELLER, K ;
SCHWANITZ, HJ .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1994, 30 (01) :44-45
[9]  
KELSO JM, 1990, ANN ALLERGY, V64, P452
[10]   Acetaldehyde induces histamine release from purified rat peritoneal mast cells [J].
Koivisto, T ;
Kaihovaara, P ;
Salaspuro, M .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1998, 64 (03) :183-190