Minilaparotomy for type II and III radical hysterectomy: technique, feasibility, and complications

被引:14
作者
Fagotti, A
Fanfani, F
Ercoli, A
Patrizi, L
Mancuso, S
Scambia, G
机构
[1] Univ Sacred Heart, Dept Gynecol Oncol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Sacred Heart, Dept Oncol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
extraperitoneal radical hysterectomy; lymphadenectomy; minilaparotomy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1048-891X.2004.14520.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective was to assess the feasibility, the operative and postoperative outcome, and complications in the use of minilaparotomy for type II and III radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLN) in early-stage cervical/endometrial cancer. A pilot study on 91 consecutive patients submitted to type II and III RH and PLN for early-stage cervical/endometrial cancer was performed between March 2002 and May 2003 in the Division of Gynecologic Oncology (UCSC, Rome). Thirty-two of 91 cases (35.2%) were eligible for minilaparotomy. The mean operative time was 156.7 min, whereas the mean intraoperative estimate of blood loss was 303.7 ml. A mean number of 32.7 pelvic lymph nodes and 6.2 common iliac nodes were removed. Ileus and removal of bladder catheter were on mean postoperative day 2.4 and 3.4, respectively. The mean number of postoperative days spent in the hospital was 3.7. Intra- and postoperative parameters were compared to laparotomy controls and literature data on laparoscopy and Pfannenstiel incision, showing substantially comparable results. Minilaparotomy is acceptable for selected patients undergoing radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) and PLN and does not compromise the adequacy of the procedure. It can be considered as an alternative to the classic midline vertical incision or even to the Pfannenstiel incisions and laparoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 859
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY - A RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING 2 TECHNIQUES FOR RESECTION OF THE CARDINAL LIGAMENT [J].
BENEDETTIPANICI, P ;
SCAMBIA, G ;
BAIOCCHI, G ;
MANESCHI, F ;
GREGGI, S ;
MANCUSO, S .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1993, 50 (02) :226-231
[2]   Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA2/IB1 cervical cancer over the past 16 years [J].
Covens, A ;
Rosen, B ;
Murphy, J ;
Laframboise, S ;
DePetrillo, AD ;
Lickrish, G ;
Colgan, T ;
Chapman, W ;
Shaw, P .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (02) :133-137
[3]  
Dargent D., 1987, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V8, P292
[4]   Minilaparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer: An alternative to standard and laparoscopic treatment [J].
Fagotti, A ;
Ferrandina, G ;
Longo, R ;
Mancuso, S ;
Scambia, G .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :177-183
[5]   RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN THE ELDERLY PATIENT - ANALYSIS OF MORBIDITY [J].
FUCHTNER, C ;
MANETTA, A ;
WALKER, JL ;
EMMA, D ;
BERMAN, M ;
DISAIA, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (02) :593-597
[6]   Radical hysterectomy: Current management guidelines [J].
Helmkamp, BF ;
Krebs, HB ;
Corbett, SL ;
Trodden, RM ;
Black, PW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (02) :372-374
[7]   Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH):: prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer [J].
Hertel, H ;
Köhler, C ;
Michels, W ;
Possover, M ;
Tozzi, R ;
Schneider, A .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (03) :505-511
[8]   Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: A prospective randomized study [J].
Landoni, F ;
Maneo, A ;
Cormio, G ;
Perego, P ;
Milani, R ;
Caruso, O ;
Mangioni, C .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 80 (01) :3-12
[9]   Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer [J].
Lee, CL ;
Huang, KG ;
Jain, S ;
Lee, PS ;
Soong, YK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (04) :481-487
[10]  
MAGRINA JF, 1995, GYNECOL ONCOL, V59, P277