Neonatal outcomes in immediate versus delayed conceptions after spontaneous abortion: A retrospective case series

被引:24
作者
Goldstein, RRP [1 ]
Croughan, MS
Robertson, PA
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
delayed conception; immediate conception; interpregnancy interval; neonatal outcome; spontaneous abortion;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.123741
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine differences in neonatal outcomes between successful pregnancies conceived immediately after a spontaneous abortion (SAB) and successful pregnancies conceived after two menstrual cycles or at least 100 days from the spontaneous abortion. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective case series. Deliveries were identified from the University of California-San Francisco Perinatal Database among patients with a history of one SAB. Medical records of 268 patients were reviewed. Sixty-four patients fulfilled study criteria, with 19 in the immediate conception group and 45 in the delayed conception group. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi(2) tests and Fisher exact tests for variables with expected values of <5, whereas continuous variables were analyzed using Student t tests. RESULTS: Neonatal outcomes for the 2 groups were similar, although neonates in the delayed conception group were more likely to have at least one of the following: low birth weight, an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: In this small retrospective case series, there was no evidence of adverse neonatal outcomes associated with conception immediately after a SAB.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1234
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Pregnancy following miscarriage: Course of grief and some determining factors [J].
Cuisinier, M ;
Janssen, H ;
deGraauw, C ;
Bakker, S ;
Hoogduin, C .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 17 (03) :168-174
[2]   IF NOTHING GOES WRONG, IS EVERYTHING ALL RIGHT - INTERPRETING ZERO NUMERATORS [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
LIPPMANHAND, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 249 (13) :1743-1745
[3]  
JOFFE M, 1994, FERTIL STERIL, V62, P71
[4]   EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT OF 1ST-TRIMESTER SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION [J].
NIELSEN, S ;
HAHLIN, M .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8942) :84-86
[5]   THE COURSE OF PREGNANCY FOLLOWING SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION [J].
RUD, B ;
KLUNDER, K .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 64 (03) :277-278
[6]   ABORTION RISK AND PREGNANCY INTERVAL [J].
VLAANDEREN, W ;
FABRIEK, LM ;
VANSEROOSKERKEN, CV .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 67 (02) :139-140
[7]   RELEVANCE OF THE MISCARRIAGE NEW PREGNANCY INTERVAL [J].
WYSS, P ;
BIEDERMANN, K ;
HUCH, A .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (03) :235-241