Computational evaluation of protein-small molecule binding

被引:64
作者
Guvench, Olgun [1 ]
MacKerell, Alexander D., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
LIGAND DOCKING PREDICTIONS; AIDED DRUG DESIGN; FREE-ENERGY; SCORING FUNCTIONS; WATER-MOLECULES; INDUCED-FIT; COMPUTER-SIMULATIONS; DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; INHIBITORS; SOLVENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbi.2008.11.009
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Determining protein-small molecule binding affinity is a key component of present-day rational drug discovery. To circumvent the time, labor, and materials costs associated with experimental protein-small molecule binding assays, a variety of structure-based computational methods have been developed for determining protein-small molecule binding affinities. These methods can be placed in one of two classes: accurate but slow (Class 1), and fast but approximate (Class 2). Class 1 methods, which explicitly take into account protein flexibility and include an atomic-level description of solvation, are capable of quantitatively reproducing experimental protein-small molecule absolute binding free energies. However, Class 1 computational requirements make screening thousands to millions of small molecules against a protein, as required for rational drug design, infeasible for the foreseeable future. Class 2 methods, on the contrary, are sufficiently fast to perform such inhibitor screening, yet they suffer from limited descriptions of protein flexibility and solvation, which in turn limit their ability to select and rank-order small molecules by computed binding affinities. This review presents an overview of Class 1 and Class 2 methods, and avenues of research in Class 2 methods aimed at bringing them closer to Class 1 accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 61
页数:6
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding [J].
Abel, Robert ;
Young, Tom ;
Farid, Ramy ;
Berne, Bruce J. ;
Friesner, Richard A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 130 (09) :2817-2831
[2]   Molecular dynamics: Survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins [J].
Adcock, Stewart A. ;
McCammon, J. Andrew .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2006, 106 (05) :1589-1615
[3]   Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design [J].
Alonso, Hernan ;
Bliznyuk, Andrey A. ;
Gready, Jill E. .
MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2006, 26 (05) :531-568
[4]   An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design [J].
Amaro, Rommie E. ;
Baron, Riccardo ;
McCammon, J. Andrew .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (09) :693-705
[5]   Classification of water molecules in protein binding sites [J].
Barillari, Caterina ;
Taylor, Justine ;
Viner, Russell ;
Essex, Jonathan W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 129 (09) :2577-2587
[6]   Absolute binding free energies: A quantitative approach for their calculation [J].
Boresch, S ;
Tettinger, F ;
Leitgeb, M ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2003, 107 (35) :9535-9551
[7]   Small molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction discovered by ensemble-based receptor models [J].
Bowman, Anna L. ;
Nikolovska-Coleska, Zaneta ;
Zhong, Haizhen ;
Wang, Shaomeng ;
Carlson, Heather A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 129 (42) :12809-12814
[8]   Molecular recognition and docking algorithms [J].
Brooijmans, N ;
Kuntz, ID .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 2003, 32 :335-373
[9]   Unbiasing scoring functions: A new normalization and rescoring strategy [J].
Carta, Giorgio ;
Knox, Andrew J. S. ;
Lloyd, David G. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2007, 47 (04) :1564-1571
[10]   Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding [J].
Chang, Chia-en A. ;
Chen, Wei ;
Gilson, Michael K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (05) :1534-1539