Impact of selective screening in the emergency department on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus control programmes

被引:6
作者
Eveillard, M.
Leroy, C.
Teissiere, F.
Lancien, E.
Branger, C.
de Lassence, A.
Joly-Guillou, M. -L
Brun, P.
机构
[1] Hop Louis Mourier, APHP, Serv Microbiol Hyg, F-92700 Colombes, France
[2] Hop Louis Mourier, APHP, Serv Accueil Urgences, F-92700 Colombes, France
[3] Hop Louis Mourier, APHP, Comite Lutte Contre Infect Nosocomiales, F-92700 Colombes, France
关键词
MRSA; emergency ward; screening programme; contact precautions;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2006.02.020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
Identification of the meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) reservoir by active screening followed by the implementation of contact precautions is one of the major components of MRSA control. programmes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of a programme of selective screening in an emergency department (ED) and the appropriateness of the contact precautions implemented. This was estimated by distinguishing necessary and unnecessary days of contact precautions. This estimation was performed for all days of contact precautions and, more specifically, for days of preventive contact precautions implemented before the availability of screening results. During a three-year period, screening of MRSA carriers was performed on 0.95% (N = 605) of patients visiting the emergency ward. Among the 193 (31.9%) MRSA carriers identified, 159 were hospitalized in the short-length-hospitalization area (SLHA) of the ED and/or in other wards. Among the 140 patients admitted to the SLHA, 44 were hospitatized for at least 48 h, with a mean length of hospitalization of 5.9 days. The cumulative duration of hospitalization of carriers identified by screening was 1897 days. In total, 2370 days of contact precautions (including 924 days of preventive precautions) were implemented for patients screened in the ED. Considering the whole hospital, the appropriateness of this entire programme of contact precautions for patients screened in the ED was 80.0% (52.1% for the SLHA), whereas the specific appropriateness of preventive isolation days was 48.6% (43.6% for the SLHA). This study underscores the risk of MRSA cross-transmission in the SLHA, and the usefulness of implementing a control programme of screening carriers in the ED. (c) 2006 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 384
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
Ayliffe GAJ, 1998, J HOSP INFECT, V39, P253, DOI 10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90293-6
[2]
A control programme for MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) containment in a paediatric intensive care unit: Evaluation and impact on infections caused by other micro-organisms [J].
Cosseron-Zerbib, M ;
Afonso, AMR ;
Naas, T ;
Durand, P ;
Meyer, L ;
Costa, Y ;
El Helali, N ;
Huault, G ;
Nordmann, P .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1998, 40 (03) :225-235
[3]
Consideration of age at admission for selective screening to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers to control dissemination in a medical ward [J].
Eveillard, M ;
Mortier, E ;
Lancien, E ;
Lescure, FX ;
Schmit, JL ;
Barnaud, G ;
Lenfant, N ;
Vinceneux, P ;
Joly-Guillou, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2006, 34 (03) :108-113
[4]
Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA):: a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test [J].
Felten, A ;
Grandry, B ;
Lagrange, PH ;
Casin, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (08) :2766-2771
[5]
Epidemiology and susceptibility of 3,051 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 25 university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY study [J].
Fluit, AC ;
Wielders, CLC ;
Verhoef, J ;
Schmitz, FJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (10) :3727-3732
[6]
A blinded comparison of three laboratory protocols for the identification of patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Gardam, M ;
Brunton, J ;
Willey, B ;
McGeer, A ;
Low, D ;
Conly, J .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (03) :152-156
[7]
Comparison of systematic versus selective screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in a high-risk dermatology ward [J].
Girou, E ;
Azar, J ;
Wolkenstein, P ;
Cizeau, M ;
Brun-Buisson, C ;
Roujeau, JC .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 21 (09) :583-587
[8]
High prevalence of carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission in elderly patients:: Implications for infection control strategies [J].
Lucet, JC ;
Grenet, K ;
Armand-Lefevre, L ;
Harnal, M ;
Bouvet, E ;
Regnier, B ;
Andremont, A .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (02) :121-126
[9]
Mishal J, 2001, SCAND J INFECT DIS, V33, P498, DOI 10.1080/00365540110026575
[10]
SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus [J].
Muto, CA ;
Jernigan, JA ;
Ostrowsky, BE ;
Richet, HM ;
Jarvis, WR ;
Boyce, JM ;
Farr, BM .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 24 (05) :362-386