Disability studies as ethnographic research and text: research strategies and roles for promoting social change?

被引:41
作者
Davis, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Res Unit Hlth & Behav Change, Sch Med, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09687590025621
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 [康复医学与理疗学];
摘要
This paper problematises the notion of research production within disability studies by comparing literature oil emancipatory research with concepts of reflexivity, authority and empowerment employed within ethnographic research. It critically examines a number of proposals within disability studies on how researchers can stimulate or contribute to processes which improve their respondents life conditions. A variety of strategies for change are discussed within the context of how ethnographers do fieldwork, and write up and disseminate their findings. This discussion also questions the role of the researcher and respondent as 'expert', suggesting that ethnographers should not privilege their own perspectives over that of respondents. It is concluded that the variety of research strategies and roles outlined in this paper need not be mutually exclusive and therefore, that there are a number of different yet complementary ways, in which researchers call contribute to the conditions within which self-emancipation flourishes.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 206
页数:16
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]
[Anonymous], DISABILITY DISCOURSE
[2]
[Anonymous], GROWING DISABILITY
[3]
[Anonymous], POPULARIZING ANTHR
[4]
[Anonymous], 1998, SYMB INTERACT
[5]
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN J CULTURAL
[6]
[Anonymous], 1987, Social Science
[7]
[Anonymous], MAGIC CARPET
[8]
[Anonymous], 1976, FUND PRINC DIS
[9]
[Anonymous], 1992, ANTHR AUTOBIOGRAPHY
[10]
[Anonymous], 1986, WRITING CULTURE POET