CemQUANT® software -: Mathematical modeling in quantitative phase analysis of Portland cement

被引:4
作者
Feret, B [1 ]
Feret, CF [1 ]
机构
[1] BF Simulat, Jonquiere, PQ G7S 2P7, Canada
关键词
clinker; Portland cement; phase composition determination; mathematical modeling; X-ray diffraction; X-ray fluorescence;
D O I
10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00147-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
It is necessary to determine a complete mineralogy of clinker cement to correctly understand, interpret, and predict the outcome of any plant production process. The cement industry's standard method (ASTM C 150) used in quantitative phase analysis of alite, belite, aluminate, and ferrite has long been known to provide approximate concentrations. The wet chemical and optical microscopy methods are too slow and too expensive to be used on a large scale. The X-ray diffraction based Rietveld method features its own limitations and so far has been used in a very small number of industrial laboratories. This article describes original commercial software named C(em)QUANT, employed for major and minor phase quantification in Portland cement. C(em)QUANT's input data consists of up to 17 constituents, such as CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, TiO2, Mn2O3, SrO, MgO, Na2O, K2O, P2O5, SO3, and loss of mass (LOM). Minor element oxides and LOM are essential if a full mineralogy is to be calculated and a high accuracy output data is to be obtained. Using a novel mathematical modeling approach, the input constituents are distributed among preselected mineral phases in such a way that the input and output mass balances are matched. The phases automatically quantified by C(em)QUANT are: alite, belite, aluminate, ferrite, aphthialite, gypsum, bassanite, lime, calcite, periclase, KC(8)A(3), NC(8)A(3), langbeinite, thenardite, KC23S12, arcanite, C(4)AMn, and anhydrite. In comparison with Bogue calculation, C(em)QUANT is much more accurate for major phases and provides concentrations of additional secondary phases. Fifteen international clinker cement reference materials were analyzed using C(em)QUANT and obtained phase concentrations were compared with data from Bogue calculations. Main methods used in clinker cement phase quantification are discussed and compared with C(em)QUANT. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1627 / 1633
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ANZELMO JA, 1987, WORLD CEMENT, V18
[2]  
BABIKIAN SH, 1993, ADV X RAY ANAL, V36, P139
[3]  
Binder K., 1987, Applications of the Monte Carlo method in statistical physics
[4]  
Bogue R.H., 1929, Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed., V1, P192, DOI [DOI 10.1021/AC50068A006, 10.1021/ac50068a006]
[5]  
BONVIN D, 1992, WORLD CEMENT, V23
[6]  
BONVIN D, 1992, XRAY SPECTROMETR OCT
[7]  
FLEMING RR, 1995, WORLD CEMENT RES DEV, P60
[8]  
Kalos M.H., 1986, Monte Carlo Methods, VI
[9]  
KANTRO DL, 1964, RES DEV LAB, V6, P20
[10]  
Kimmerle FM, 1997, LIGHT METALS 1997, P9