Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay?

被引:31
作者
Norton, EC
Van Houtven, CH
Lindrooth, RC
Normand, SLT
Dickey, B
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Ctr Hlth Ind Market Econ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
price elasticity; length of stay; prospective payment; health economics; hospital;
D O I
10.1002/hec.675
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A change in payment mechanism for inpatient care from per them to per episode creates two incentives - a marginal and an average price effect - to change length of stay. The decrease in marginal price per day to zero should reduce the length of stay, while an increase in average price per inpatient stay should increase the length of stay. This study uses data from a natural experiment to estimate both marginal and average price elasticities, and to test whether the length of stay falls after the introduction of prospective payment in a sample of 8509 severely mentally ill patients. We estimate that the marginal price elasticity is zero, but the average price elasticity is between 0.16 and 0.20. The results were generally robust for short- and long stayers, and for persons admitted early and late after the change in payment mechanism. The model controlled for hospital fixed effects and individual random effects. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 387
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO MODEL-SPECIFICATION IN ECONOMETRICS [J].
BREUSCH, TS ;
PAGAN, AR .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (01) :239-253
[2]   THE INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE MEDICAL OUTCOMES UNDER PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT [J].
CUTLER, DM .
ECONOMETRICA, 1995, 63 (01) :29-50
[3]  
Dickey B, 1996, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V53, P945
[4]   Hospital response to prospective payment: Moral hazard, selection, and practice-style effects [J].
Ellis, RP ;
McGuire, TG .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1996, 15 (03) :257-277
[5]  
Frank R G., 2000, Handbook of health economics, P893, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-0064
[6]   RISK CONTRACTS IN MANAGED MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE [J].
FRANK, RG ;
MCGUIRE, TG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1995, 14 (03) :50-64
[7]  
FREIMAN MP, 1989, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V26, P192
[8]  
Gilman BH, 2000, HEALTH ECON, V9, P277, DOI 10.1002/1099-1050(200006)9:4<277::AID-HEC513>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-1
[10]  
HARROW BS, 1992, EC MENTAL HLTH, P19