Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war

被引:344
作者
Fortna, VP [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00301.x
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article examines international interventions in the aftermath of civil wars to see whether peace lasts longer when peacekeepers are present than when they are absent. Because peacekeeping is not applied to cases at random, I first address the question of where international personnel tend to be deployed. I then attempt to control for factors that might affect both the likelihood of peacekeepers being sent and the ease or difficulty of maintaining peace so as to avoid spurious findings. I find, in a nutshell, that peacekeeping after civil wars does indeed make an important contribution to the stability of peace.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 292
页数:24
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, Survival, DOI DOI 10.1080/00396339508442815
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, EXTERNAL INTERVENTIO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, UN PEACEKEEPING CAMB
  • [4] BLECHMAN B, 1997, EFFECTIVE TRANSITION
  • [5] Nonproportional hazards and event history analysis in international relations
    Box-Steffensmeier, JM
    Reiter, D
    Zorn, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2003, 47 (01) : 33 - 53
  • [6] Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science
    BoxSteffensmeier, JM
    Jones, BS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 41 (04) : 1414 - 1461
  • [7] On the incidence of civil war in Africa
    Collier, P
    Hoeffler, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2002, 46 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [8] COLLIER P, 1999, EC CAUSES CIVIL WAR
  • [9] Collier P., 2000, Policy Research Working Paper 2355
  • [10] Dawson P, 1994, PEACEKEEPERS KASHMIR