Anti hypertensive efficacy of olmesartan compared with other antihypertensive drugs

被引:48
作者
Stumpe, KO [1 ]
Ludwig, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clin Bonn, Dept Internal Med, D-53111 Bonn, Germany
关键词
antihypertensive agents; angiotensin II; olmesartan;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jhh.1001395
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The therapeutic profile of olmesartan medoxomil, which is a recently developed angiotensin 11 (A 11) receptor blocker, has been compared with four commonly used anti hypertensive therapeutic drugs (atenolol, captopril, felodipine and losartan) in five separate multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III trials. The trials were designed to compare the efficacy of individually optimised dosages of olmesartan medoxomil and the comparator agent. The primary efficacy variable in all trials was the mean change from baseline to week 12 in trough mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Olmesartan medoxomil (10-20 mg once daily (o.d.)) showed similar efficacy to atenolol (50-100 mg o.d.), both in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and, when given together with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg o.d., in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension. Olmesartan medoxomil (20-40 mg o.d.) was also similar in efficacy to felodipine (5-10 mg o.d.) in reducing BP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Compared with captopril (12.5-50 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)) and losartan (50-100 mg o.d.), in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, olmesartan medoxomil (5-20 mg o.d. and 10-20 mg o.d., respectively) was significantly superior in terms of lowering DBP from baseline to week 12. In terms of the secondary efficacy variable, which was mean change from baseline to week 12 in trough mean sitting systolic BID, olmesartan showed significant superiority to atenolol, captopril and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. In the longer term, compared with losartan, a lower percentage of olmesartan-treated patients required concomitant HCTZ after 12 weeks of therapy. Olmesartan was well tolerated in all studies.
引用
收藏
页码:S24 / S28
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Ball Keith J., 2001, Journal of Hypertension, V19, pS49
[2]   Non-peptide angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension [J].
Birkenhäger, WH ;
de Leeuw, PW .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 17 (07) :873-881
[3]   The new oral angiotensin II antagonist olmesartan medoxomil: a concise overview [J].
Brunner, HR .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2002, 16 (Suppl 2) :S13-S16
[4]  
de Leeuw PW, 1999, AM J CARDIOL, V84, p5K
[5]   BLOOD-PRESSURE AND MORTALITY AMONG MEN WITH PRIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
FLACK, JM ;
NEATON, J ;
GRIMM, R ;
SHIH, J ;
CUTLER, J ;
ENSRUD, K ;
MACMAHON, S .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (09) :2437-2445
[6]  
GALLAGHER M, 1998, INPHARM, V1143, P13
[7]  
Laeis Petra, 2001, Journal of Hypertension, V19, pS21
[8]   Comparative safety and tolerability of angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Mazzolai, L ;
Burnier, M .
DRUG SAFETY, 1999, 21 (01) :23-33
[9]  
Neutel JM, 1999, AM J CARDIOL, V84, p13K
[10]   Comparative anti hypertensive efficacy of olmesartan: comparison with other angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Oparil, S .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2002, 16 (Suppl 2) :S17-S23