Scientific Achievement and Editorial Board Membership

被引：81

作者：

Bedeian, Arthur G. ^{[1
]}

Van Fleet, David D. ^{[2
]}

Hyman, Hugh H., III ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA

[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Global Management, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA

[3] Louisiana Dept Hlth & Hosp, Off Mental Hlth, Baton Rouge, LA 70821 USA

来源：

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS | 2009年 / 12卷 / 02期

关键词：

bibiliometrics; infometrics; philosophy of science; scientific ethos; scientometrics; AUTHOR SELF-CITATIONS; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; SCIENCE; WORK; MANAGEMENT; PUBLICATION; INDEX; JOURNALS; QUALITY; COLLABORATION;

D O I：

10.1177/1094428107309312

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

A cornerstone of the scientific ethos is that editorial board members should be selected based on their scholarly achievements, as demonstrated by publications in peer-reviewed journals and evidence that their work is of value to others in their disciplines. To discern if this reasoning is applied in practice, this study examined the scholarly records of the editorial boards of premier peer-reviewed journals sponsored by the leading professional associations in management and six related disciplines.

引用

页码：211 / 238

页数：28

共 98 条

[1]

*AC MAN, 2006, J GOVERNANCE TA 0810

[2]

*AC MAN, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P1188

[3]

*AM PSYCH ASS, 2005, J APPL PSYCHOL, V90, P820

[4]

[Anonymous], 2003, Peer review in health sciences