A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies

被引:5685
作者
Grant, Maria J. [1 ]
Booth, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Sch Nursing, SCNMCR, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
OF-THE-LITERATURE; LIBRARIANS; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Background and objectives : The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains. Methods : Following scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant). A simple analytical framework-Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA)-was used to examine the main review types. Results : Fourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain. Conclusions : Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 108
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] ALONSO PG, 1968, GEOGRAPHY MAP DIVISI, V74, P15
  • [2] Ankem K., 2008, LIB INFORM RES, V32, P91, DOI [10.29173/lirg58, DOI 10.29173/LIRG58]
  • [3] ANKEM K, 2006, INFORM RES, V11
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, REA toolkit: Rapid evidence assessment toolkit index
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, OXFORD ENGLISH DICT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research
  • [8] Beverley C A, 2003, Health Info Libr J, V20, P65, DOI 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x
  • [9] BEVERLEY CA, 2003, HLTH INFORM LIB J, V20, P10
  • [10] Bond K., 2007, EVIDENCE BASED CHILD, V2, P4