Structured review of physical activity measurement with questionnaires and scales in older adults and the elderly

被引:17
作者
Adolf Guirao-Goris, Josep [1 ]
Cabrero-Garcia, Julio [2 ]
Moreno Pina, J. Patricia [3 ]
Luz Munoz-Mendoza, Carmen [2 ]
机构
[1] Escola Univ Infermeria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Alacant, Dept Infermeria, Alicante, Spain
[3] Serv Murciano Salud, Murcia, Spain
关键词
Physical activity; Motor activity; Reproducibility of results; Questionnaires; Scales; Sedentary lifestyle; Lifestyle;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.03.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To characterize the distinct questionnaires and scales used to measure physical activity, their conceptual frameworks, psychometric properties and application norms. Method: The review included original articles that used questionnaires or scales to assess physical activity in older adults or the elderly. The CINAHL and MEDLINE databases were consulted for the years 1993 to 2007. The studies selected had to provide information on the use, development and psychometric properties of the instruments. Instruments used in the population aged more than 45 years old were p included. Articles that assessed physical activity by direct estimation, complex methods, or physical performance were excluded. Results: The search produced 166 references and 36 instruments were identified. Most of the studies quantified physical activity, and a minority assessed self-efficacy in physical activity performance and the stage of change, Half of the instruments were self-administered. The most frequently studied reliability was test-retest. Criterion validity was studied in 14 instruments, and 11 of these used at least two alternative methods of measurement. Construct validity was assessed in 26 instruments. Responsiveness was evaluated in only three instruments (YPAS, CHAMPS and Exercise Stage of Change) in addition to reliability and validity. Conclusions: The Exercise Stage of Change questionnaire showed responsiveness and sufficient reliability to allow individual use. The 7Day PAR questionnaire and the Modified Baecke Questionnaire (Spanish version), which evaluate physical activity, can be used on an individual basis, although their responsiveness has not been Studied. In general, the instruments analyzed do not assess mild intensity activities. (c) 2008 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 334
页数:1
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Blair S.N., Haskell W.L., Ho P., Et al., Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments, Am J Epidemiol, 122, pp. 794-804, (1985)
  • [2] Paffenbarger R.S.J., Wing A.L., Hyde R.T., Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. 1978, Am J Epidemiol, 142, pp. 889-903, (1995)
  • [3] Kesaniemi Y.K., Danforth E.J., Jensen M.D., Et al., Dose-response issues concerning physical activity and health: an evidence-based symposium, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 33, 6 SUPPL, (2001)
  • [4] Physical activity and health: a report of the surgeon general, (1996)
  • [5] Howley E.T., Type of activity: resistance, aerobic and leisure versus occupational physical activity, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 33, 6 SUPPL, (2001)
  • [6] Shephard R.J., Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires, Br J Sports Med, 37, pp. 197-206, (2003)
  • [7] Bull F., Defining physical inactivity, Lancet, 361, pp. 258-259, (2003)
  • [8] Burton L.C., Paglia M.J., German P.S., Et al., The effect among older persons of a general preventive visit on three health behaviors: smoking, excessive alcohol drinking, and sedentary lifestyle, Prev Med, 24, pp. 492-497, (1995)
  • [9] Scroggins L.M., Diagnosis review committee report, Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, 15, pp. 29-30, (2004)
  • [10] Guirao-Goris J., Duarte-Climents G., The expert nurse profile and diagnostic content validity of Sedentary Lifestyle: the Spanish validation, Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, 18, pp. 84-92, (2007)