β2 Agonist for the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:23
作者
Singh, Balwinder [1 ]
Tiwari, Akhilesh Kumar [4 ]
Singh, Kuljit [5 ]
Singh, Shannon K. [2 ]
Ahmed, Adil [1 ]
Erwin, Patricia J. [3 ]
Franco, Pablo Moreno [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Gen Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Mayo Med Lib, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[5] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Div Med, Dept Cardiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Transplant Crit Care Serv, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
acute lung injury; ALI; acute respiratory distress syndrome; ARDS; beta(2) agonist; outcomes; mortality; ventilator-free days; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; BETA(2)-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS; ALMITRINE BISMESYLATE; FLUID CLEARANCE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; GAS-EXCHANGE; SALBUTAMOL; ASSOCIATION; MULTICENTER; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.4187/respcare.02571
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: The use of beta(2) agonist as an intervention for acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS patients is controversial, so we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published randomized controlled trials of using beta(2) agonists to improve outcomes (mortality and ventilator free days) among patients with ALI/ARDS. METHODS: A comprehensive search of 7 major databases (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and other non-indexed citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and Scopus) for randomized controlled trials using beta(2) agonists for ALI from their origin to March 2013 was conducted. The effect size was measured by relative risk for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference for continuous outcomes, with 95% CI. The statistical heterogeneity between the studies was assessed with the Cochran Q test and I-2 statistic. The heterogeneity of > 50% was considered significant for the analysis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to ascertain the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Out of 219 studies screened, 3 randomized controlled trials reported mortality and ventilator-free days, in 646 ALL! ARDS subjects. Of the 646 subjects, 334 (51.7%) received beta(2) agonist and 312 (48.3%) received placebo. There was no significant decrease in 28-day mortality or hospital mortality in the beta(2)-agonist group: relative risk 1.04, 95% CI 0.50-2.16, and relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 0.95-1.56, respectively. The ventilator-free days and organ-failure-free days were significantly lower for the ALI subjects who received beta(2) agonists: mean difference -2.19 days (95% CI -3.68 to -1.99 d) and mean difference -2.04 days (95% CI -3.74 to -0.35 d), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with ALI/ARDS, beta(2) agonists were not only nonbeneficial in improving the survival, but were harmful and increased morbidity (reduced organ-failure-free days and ventilator-free days). The current evidence discourages the use of beta(2) agonist in ALI/ARDS patients. (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, 2012:CRD42012002616.)
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 296
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]
[Anonymous], CRIT CARE MED
[2]
[Anonymous], REV MAN REVMAN 5 1
[3]
The rise and fall of β-agonists in the treatment of ARDS [J].
Bassford, Christopher R. ;
Thickett, David R. ;
Perkins, Gavin D. .
CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (02)
[4]
THE AMERICAN-EUROPEAN CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON ARDS - DEFINITIONS, MECHANISMS, RELEVANT OUTCOMES, AND CLINICAL-TRIAL COORDINATION [J].
BERNARD, GR ;
ARTIGAS, A ;
BRIGHAM, KL ;
CARLET, J ;
FALKE, K ;
HUDSON, L ;
LAMY, M ;
LEGALL, JR ;
MORRIS, A ;
SPRAGG, R ;
COCHIN, B ;
LANKEN, PN ;
LEEPER, KV ;
MARINI, J ;
MURRAY, JF ;
OPPENHEIMER, L ;
PESENTI, A ;
REID, L ;
RINALDO, J ;
VILLAR, J ;
VANASBECK, BS ;
DHAINAUT, JF ;
MANCEBO, J ;
MATTHAY, M ;
MEYRICK, B ;
PAYEN, D ;
PERRET, C ;
FOWLER, AA ;
SCHALLER, MD ;
HUDSON, LD ;
HYERS, T ;
KNAUS, W ;
MATTHAY, R ;
PINSKY, M ;
BONE, RC ;
BOSKEN, C ;
JOHANSON, WG ;
LEWANDOWSKI, K ;
REPINE, J ;
RODRIGUEZROISIN, R ;
ROUSSOS, C ;
ANTONELLI, MA ;
BELOUCIF, S ;
BIHARI, D ;
BURCHARDI, H ;
LEMAIRE, F ;
MONTRAVERS, P ;
PETTY, TL ;
ROBOTHAM, J ;
ZAPOL, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 149 (03) :818-824
[5]
Pharmacotherapy for Prevention and Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Current and Experimental Approaches [J].
Bosma, Karen J. ;
Taneja, Ravi ;
Lewis, James F. .
DRUGS, 2010, 70 (10) :1255-1282
[6]
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure [J].
Burns, Karen E. A. ;
Adhikari, Neill K. J. ;
Keenan, Sean P. ;
Meade, Maureen O. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (08)
[7]
Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Bronchodilators [J].
Cazzola, Mario ;
Page, Clive P. ;
Calzetta, Luigino ;
Matera, M. Gabriella .
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2012, 64 (03) :450-504
[8]
Cepkova Magda, 2006, J Intensive Care Med, V21, P119, DOI 10.1177/0885066606287045
[9]
[10]
The stress response and critical illness: A review [J].
Cuesta, Jeronimo M. ;
Singer, Mervyn .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (12) :3283-3289