Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: The evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies

被引:204
作者
Beddoe, Rachael [4 ]
Costanza, Robert [3 ,4 ]
Farley, Joshua [4 ]
Garza, Eric [3 ,4 ]
Kent, Jennifer [2 ]
Kubiszewski, Ida [3 ,4 ]
Martinez, Luz [3 ,4 ]
McCowen, Tracy
Murphy, Kathleen [4 ]
Myers, Norman [1 ]
Ogden, Zach
Stapleton, Kevin
Woodward, John
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, 21st Century Sch, Oxford OX3 8FS, England
[2] Independent Environm Res, Oxford OX4 3SE, England
[3] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, George D Aiken Ctr, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
cultural adaptation; ecology; societal decline; COLLAPSE; CIVILIZATIONS; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0812570106
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A high and sustainable quality of life is a central goal for humanity. Our current socio-ecological regime and its set of interconnected worldviews, institutions, and technologies all support the goal of unlimited growth of material production and consumption as a proxy for quality of life. However, abundant evidence shows that, beyond a certain threshold, further material growth no longer significantly contributes to improvement in quality of life. Not only does further material growth not meet humanity's central goal, there is mounting evidence that it creates significant roadblocks to sustainability through increasing resource constraints (i.e., peak oil, water limitations) and sink constraints (i.e., climate disruption). Overcoming these roadblocks and creating a sustainable and desirable future will require an integrated, systems level redesign of our socio-ecological regime focused explicitly and directly on the goal of sustainable quality of life rather than the proxy of unlimited material growth. This transition, like all cultural transitions, will occur through an evolutionary process, but one that we, to a certain extent, can control and direct. We suggest an integrated set of worldviews, institutions, and technologies to stimulate and seed this evolutionary redesign of the current socio-ecological regime to achieve global sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:2483 / 2489
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Alvord SarahH., 2004, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, V40, P260, DOI DOI 10.1177/0021886304266847
[2]  
[Anonymous], CAPITALISM 3 0
[3]  
Banathy BH, 1998, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V15, P161, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199805/06)15:3<161::AID-SRES228>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-0
[5]  
Barker T, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P25
[6]  
Boulding KennethE., 1968, Beyond Economics: Essays on Society, Religion, and Ethics
[7]  
Boyd R., 2005, Not by Genes Alone, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226712130.001.0001
[8]  
BROWN PG, 2007, COMMONWEALTH LIFE NE
[9]  
*BUR NAT EC ACC, 2007, CURR DOLL REAL GDP
[10]   A policy approach to the environmental impacts of technological lock-in [J].
Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 58 (04) :717-742