MHD beta limits for advanced scenarios on JET

被引:28
作者
Bondeson, A [1 ]
Liu, DH
Söldner, FX
Persson, M
Baranov, YF
Huysmans, GTA
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Euratom NFR Fus Assoc, Dept Electromagnet, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Jet Joint Undertaking, Abingdon OX14 3EA, Oxon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0029-5515/39/11/303
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Ideal MHD limits to beta and bootstrap fraction are computed for pressure profiles similar to those of JET discharges with both internal and H mode transport barriers. Several non-monotonic current profiles are tested, and the pressure profile is constrained so that no negative current drive is required in steady state. Calculations are made both with and without an ideally conducting wall. The main result is that, for such peaked pressure profiles, the limits to beta and bootstrap fraction improve at low internal inductance, in particular when wall stabilization is taken into account. The highest limits to beta, and often also to normalized beta, occur for the maximum plasma current. There is also a weak dependence on q(min), for which three favourable regions have been identified. A highly advantageous region is found at q(min) similar or equal to 1.6, where the limits to beta* are 7.0% with, and 4.8% without, wall stabilization. The corresponding limits are 68 and 50%, respectively, for the bootstrap fraction and 4.0 and 2.9 for the normalized beta. These equilibria have low internal inductance, l(i) = 0.62. For higher inductance, an optimum occurs when q(min) similar or equal to 1.2, where the limit to beta* is 5.3% with a wall and 4.7% without. The corresponding bootstrap fractions are about 46 and 38%, respectively. A third type of equilibrium that is interesting for steady state operation has q(min) similar or equal to 2.1 and low inductance. Here the beta* limits are lower, 4.9 and 3.4%, but the bootstrap fractions are higher, 77 and 60%.
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1533
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   STABILIZATION OF EXTERNAL-MODES IN TOKAMAKS BY RESISTIVE WALLS AND PLASMA ROTATION [J].
BONDESON, A ;
WARD, DJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1994, 72 (17) :2709-2712
[2]   Resistive wall mode stabilization in toroidal geometry [J].
Bondeson, A ;
Gimblett, CG ;
Hastie, RJ .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1999, 6 (03) :637-640
[3]   Magnetohydrodynamic beta limits for tokamaks with negative central shear [J].
Bondeson, A ;
Benda, M ;
Persson, M ;
Chu, MS .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1997, 37 (10) :1419-1429
[4]  
BONDESON A, 1993, CONTROLLED FUSIO C 4, V17, P1339
[5]   Negative magnetic shear modes of operation in the Alcator C-Mod tokamak near the beta limit [J].
Bonoli, PT ;
Porkolab, M ;
Ramos, JJ ;
Nevins, W ;
Kessel, C .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1997, 39 (02) :223-236
[6]   Resistive interchange modes in negative central shear tokamaks with peaked pressure profiles [J].
Chu, MS ;
Greene, JM ;
Lao, LL ;
Miller, RL ;
Bondeson, A ;
Sauter, O ;
Rice, BW ;
Strait, EJ ;
Taylor, TS ;
Turnbull, AD .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 77 (13) :2710-2713
[7]   EFFECT OF TOROIDAL PLASMA-FLOW AND FLOW SHEAR ON GLOBAL MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC MHD MODES [J].
CHU, MS ;
GREENE, JM ;
JENSEN, TH ;
MILLER, RL ;
BONDESON, A ;
JOHNSON, RW ;
MAUEL, ME .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1995, 2 (06) :2236-2241
[8]  
Fujita T, 1997, P S IAEA, P227
[9]   Direct observation of the resistive wall mode in a tokamak and its interaction with plasma rotation [J].
Garofalo, AM ;
Turnbull, AD ;
Austin, ME ;
Bialek, J ;
Chu, MS ;
Comer, KJ ;
Fredrickson, ED ;
Groebner, RJ ;
La Haye, RJ ;
Lao, LL ;
Lazarus, EA ;
Navratil, GA ;
Osborne, TH ;
Rice, BW ;
Sabbagh, SA ;
Scoville, JT ;
Strait, EJ ;
Taylor, TS .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1999, 82 (19) :3811-3814
[10]  
GORMEZANO C, 1997, FUSION ENERGY 1996, V1, P487