Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic renal insufficiency

被引:33
作者
Greenbaum, R
Zucchelli, P
Caspi, A
Nouriel, H
Paz, R
Sclarovsky, S
O'Grady, P
Yee, KF
Liao, WC
Mangold, B
机构
[1] Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceut Res Inst, Dept Clin Pharmacol, B-1410 Waterloo, Belgium
[2] Edgware Gen Hosp, Edgware HA8 0AD, Middx, England
[3] Policlin S Orsola Malpighi, Malpighi Dept Neurol, Bologna, Italy
[4] Kaplan Hosp, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[5] Beilinson Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Petach Tikva, Israel
[6] Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceut Res Inst, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
关键词
angiotensin-converting enzyme; congestive heart failure; enalapril; enalaprilat; fosinopril; fosinoprilat; lisinopril; pharmacokinetics; renal insufficiency;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00103.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aims To compare the serum pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril after 1 and 10 days of dosing with fosinopril, enalapril and lisinopril. Methods Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF, NYHA Class II-IV) and chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than or equal to 30 ml min(-1)) were randomized to receive fosinopril, enalapril or lisinopril in two parallel-group studies. In the first study 24 patients were treated with 10 mg fosinopril (n = 12 patients) or 2.5 mg enalapril (n = 12) every morning for 10 consecutive days. In the second study 31 patients were treated with 10 mg fosinopril (n = 16 patients) or 5 mg lisinopril (n = 15) every morning for 10 consecutive days. Samples of blood were collected for determination of pharmacokinetic parameters. The area under the curve (AUC) between the first and last days of treatment and the accumulation index (AI) were the primary outcome measures. Results All three angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors exhibited a significant increase in AUC between the first and last days of treatment in both studies. The difference between the AI for fosinoprilat (1.41) and enalaprilat (1.96) was statistically significant (95% CI: 1.05, 1.84). Similarly, the difference between the AI for fosinoprilat (1.21) and lisinopril (2.76) was statistically significant (95% CI: 1.85, 2.69). All three ACE inhibitors completely inhibited serum ACE for 24 h. All treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions Fosinoprilat exhibits significantly less accumulation than enalaprilat or lisinopril in patients with CHF and renal insufficiency, most probably because fosinoprilat is eliminated by both the kidney and liver, and increased hepatic elimination can compensate for reduced renal clearance in patients with kidney dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF ENALAPRIL IN CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE [J].
DICKSTEIN, K .
DRUGS, 1986, 32 :40-44
[2]  
FRUNCILLO RJ, 1987, KIDNEY INT, V31, pS117
[3]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF LISINOPRIL (MK521) IN HEALTHY-YOUNG AND ELDERLY SUBJECTS AND IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC-FAILURE [J].
GAUTAM, PC ;
VARGAS, E ;
LYE, M .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 39 (11) :929-931
[4]   THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF FOSINOPRIL IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS [J].
GEHR, TWB ;
SICA, DA ;
GRASELA, DM ;
DUCHIN, KL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 45 (05) :431-436
[5]   FOSINOPRIL - AN OVERVIEW [J].
GUTHRIE, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 72 (20) :H22-H24
[6]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF FOSINOPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH VARIOUS DEGREES OF RENAL-FUNCTION [J].
HUI, KK ;
DUCHIN, KL ;
KRIPALANI, KJ ;
CHAN, D ;
KRAMER, PK ;
YANAGAWA, N .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1991, 49 (04) :457-467
[7]  
JOHNSTON D, 1992, AM J CARDIOL, V70, pC151
[8]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF ENALAPRIL IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS WITH RENAL IMPAIRMENT [J].
KELLY, JG ;
DOYLE, G ;
DONOHUE, J ;
LAHER, M ;
VANDENBURG, MJ ;
CURRIE, WJC ;
COOPER, WD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 21 (01) :63-69
[9]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF LISINOPRIL, ENALAPRIL AND ENALAPRILAT IN RENAL-FAILURE - EFFECTS OF HEMODIALYSIS [J].
KELLY, JG ;
DOYLE, GD ;
CARMODY, M ;
GLOVER, DR ;
COOPER, WD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 26 (06) :781-786
[10]  
LIAO W, 1994, J CLIN PHARMACOL, V34, P1025