Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota

被引:40
作者
Scupham, A. J. [1 ]
Jones, J. A. [1 ]
Wesley, I. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Pre Harvest Food Safety & Enter Dis Res Unit, Natl Anim Dis Ctr, Ames, IA 50010 USA
关键词
bacterial; diversity; ecology; faeces; fungal; purification;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03094.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
As a prelude to long-term studies to characterize the microbiota of the turkey ceca, 14 DNA isolation protocols were evaluated for their ability to reproducibly characterize microbial diversity. Eight commercially available DNA extraction kits were assessed. DNA quantity and quality were assessed and competitive PCR was used to quantify the 16S bacterial rRNA genes. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples yielded over eight times more DNA than any other method (3144 +/- 873 mu g g(-1) of sample, P < 0.05). Bacterial and fungal species richness was estimated by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit generated the greatest bacterial species richness (46 +/- 7 peaks) while Bio-Rad Aquapure yielded the highest fungal species richness (71 +/- 9.5 peaks). Cluster analysis indicated different DNA extraction methods generated different microbial community compositions using the same cecal matrix from a single donor bird. Optimized DNA extraction protocols Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples and Bio-Rad Aquapure outperform other methods for extraction of DNA from poultry fecal samples, although these methods do not necessarily recover all available DNA. They will be used in future studies to monitor the dynamics of microbial communities of the avian ceca.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 409
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Apajalahti JHA, 1998, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V64, P4084
  • [2] ISOLATION AND PROPERTIES OF PREDOMINANT ANAEROBIC BACTERIA IN CAECA OF CHICKENS AND TURKEYS
    BARNES, EM
    IMPEY, CS
    [J]. BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1970, 11 (04) : 467 - &
  • [3] BENT E, 2004, 10 INT S MICR ECOL, P42
  • [4] BEUTLER E, 1990, BIOTECHNIQUES, V9, P166
  • [5] Improved silica-guanidiniumthiocyanate DNA isolation procedure based on selective binding of bovine alpha-casein to silica particles
    Boom, R
    Sol, C
    Beld, M
    Weel, J
    Goudsmit, J
    Wertheim-van Dillen, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (03) : 615 - 619
  • [6] Molecular microbial diversity in soils from eastern Amazonia: Evidence for unusual microorganisms and microbial population shifts associated with deforestation
    Borneman, J
    Triplett, EW
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 63 (07) : 2647 - 2653
  • [7] A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil
    Bürgmann, H
    Pesaro, M
    Widmer, F
    Zeyer, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 45 (01) : 7 - 20
  • [8] Comparison of different primer sets for use in automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of complex bacterial communities
    Cardinale, M
    Brusetti, L
    Quatrini, P
    Borin, S
    Puglia, AM
    Rizzi, A
    Zanardini, E
    Sorlini, C
    Corselli, C
    Daffonchio, D
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 70 (10) : 6147 - 6156
  • [9] Fisher MM, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P4630
  • [10] Frostegård Å, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P5409