Assessing changes in presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents during movement in humans

被引:72
作者
PierrotDeseilligny, E
机构
[1] Lab. de Neurophysiol. Clin., R., Hop. de la Salpétrière, 47 boulevard de l'Hôpital
关键词
presynaptic inhibition; Ia afferents; H-reflex; monosynaptic excitation; vibratory inhibition; voluntary movement; humans;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-0270(97)02249-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Different methods, based on different principles, have been proposed to estimate changes in presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals (accompanied by primary afferent depolarization, (PAD)) during voluntary contraction in humans. (i) A discrepancy between the H-reflex amplitude, at an equal level of EMG activity, in two situations (e.g., walking and standing) may be taken as suggesting a different control of PAD interneurones in the two cases. (ii) A conditioning stimulation (vibration or electrical stimulation) is used to activate PAD interneurones and to evoke presynaptic inhibition of the afferent volley of the test reflex. The resulting long-lasting depression of the reflex depends on the excitability of PAD interneurones, but can be contaminated by long-lasting post-synaptic effects. (iii) The amount of reflex facilitation evoked by a purely monosynaptic Ia volley varies inversely with the on-going presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents mediating the conditioning volley, and can be used to assess this on-going presynaptic inhibition. None of these methods can provide by itself unequivocal evidence for a change in presynaptic inhibition of la terminals, but reasonably reliable interpretations may be proposed when congruent results are obtained with different methods. Thus it has been shown that, during selective voluntary contraction, presynaptic inhibition is decreased on Ia afferents projecting on motoneurones of the contracting muscle and increased on Ia afferents projecting on motor nuclei not involved in the contraction. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1966, MUSCULAR AFFERENTS M
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SPASTICITY MECH MANA
[3]   HUMAN MOTONEURON RESPONSES TO GROUP-1 VOLLEYS BLOCKED PRESYNAPTICALLY BY VIBRATION [J].
ASHBY, P ;
VERRIER, M .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1980, 184 (02) :511-516
[4]  
ASHBY P, 1980, PROG CLIN NEUROPHYS, P254
[5]   Spike train analysis [J].
Awiszus, F .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1997, 74 (02) :155-166
[6]   EVIDENCE FAVORING PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION BETWEEN ANTAGONIST MUSCLE AFFERENTS IN THE HUMAN FOREARM [J].
BERARDELLI, A ;
DAY, BL ;
MARSDEN, CD ;
ROTHWELL, JC .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1987, 391 :71-83
[7]   CHANGES IN PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION OF AFFERENTS TO PROPRIOSPINAL-LIKE NEURONS IN MAN DURING VOLUNTARY CONTRACTIONS [J].
BURKE, D ;
GRACIES, JM ;
MEUNIER, S ;
PIERROTDESEILLIGNY, E .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1992, 449 :673-687
[8]   MONO-SYNAPTIC AND OLIGOSYNAPTIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO HUMAN ANKLE JERK AND H-REFLEX [J].
BURKE, D ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
MCKEON, B .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 52 (03) :435-448
[9]   RESPONSES OF HUMAN MUSCLE-SPINDLE ENDINGS TO VIBRATION OF NON-CONTRACTING MUSCLES [J].
BURKE, D ;
HAGBARTH, KE ;
LOFSTEDT, L ;
WALLIN, BG .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1976, 261 (03) :673-693
[10]   DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF A FLEXOR NERVE INPUT ON THE HUMAN SOLEUS H-REFLEX DURING STANDING VERSUS WALKING [J].
CAPADAY, C ;
LAVOIE, BA ;
COMEAU, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 73 (04) :436-449