Biocompatibility of various formula root filling materials for primary teeth

被引:22
作者
Huang, Tsui-Hsien
Ding, Shinn-Jyh
Kao, Chia-Tze [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Inst Oral Mat Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
primary teeth; zinc oxide eugenol; formocresol; iodoform; biocompatibility;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.30621
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different materials used in primary root canal fillings on the cell viability of human osteosarcoma cell lines. The experimental group contained six different types of root canal filling materials, including zinc oxide (ZnO) + eugenol + formocresol (FC), Ca(OH)(2) + FC, Ca(OH)(2) + lodoform, Ca(OH)(2) + lodoform + camphorated parachlorophenol (CPC), Ca(OH)(2) + CPC, and Vitapex. Cell viability tests were performed using tetrazolium bromide colorimetric (MTT) assay on human osteosacorma cell lines (U2OS). The results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student-Newman-Keul's test with p < 0.05 showed statistical differences. The ZnO + eugenol + FC group and Ca(OH)(2) + FC group showed the lowest survival rates (p < 0.05). The Ca(OH)(2) + lodoform + CPC group and Ca(OH)(2) + CPC group showed significantly lower survival rates at concentrations above 6 mu L/mL (p < 0.05). The Ca(OH)(2) + lodoform group and Vitapex group showed the highest survival rates (p < 0.05). We concluded that the use of calcium hydroxide with iodoform as a root filling base material is a better option than other medications. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 490
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1930, Journal of the American Dental Association
[2]
CASTAGNOLA L, 1952, BR DENT J, V93, P93
[3]
Effects of camphorated parachlorophenol on human periodontal ligament cells in vitro [J].
Chang, YC ;
Tai, KW ;
Chou, LSS ;
Chou, MY .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (12) :779-781
[4]
Coll James A., 1996, Pediatric Dentistry, V18, P57
[5]
COULD JM, 1972, ASDC J DENT CHILD, V39, P269
[6]
Antioxidant and prooxidant action of eugenol-related compounds and their cytotoxicity [J].
Fujisawa, S ;
Atsumi, T ;
Kadoma, Y ;
Sakagami, H .
TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 177 (01) :39-54
[7]
Fuks A B, 1991, Curr Opin Dent, V1, P556
[8]
GARCIAGODOY F, 1987, J DENT CHILD, V54, P30
[9]
An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of orthodontic bonding adhesives upon a primary human oral gingival fibroblast culture and a permanent, human oral cancer-cell line [J].
Huang, TH ;
Tsai, CY ;
Chen, SL ;
Kao, CT .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2002, 63 (06) :814-821
[10]
JENG H-W, 1987, Pediatric Dentistry, V9, P295