Initial comparison of lightning mapping with operational time-of-arrival and interferometric systems

The mapping of lightning radiation sources produced by the operational Time-of-Arrival National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Lightning Detection and Ranging (NASA/LDAR) system is compared with that of the Interferometric French Office National D'Etudes et de Recherches Aerospatiales (ONERA-3D) system. The comparison comprises lightning activity in three Florida storms and also individual flashes in one of these storms. Although limited in scope, the comparison and analysis show a significant difference in the representation of lighting radiation by each mapping system. During the duration of a flash, the LDAR data show a continuity in time and a three-dimensional structure of radiation sources. The ONERA-3D radiation source data are more intermittent in time and have a more two-dimensional structure. The distinction between the radiation sources mapped by the two systems is also reflected in the difference between their propagation speeds, 10(4)-10(5) m s(-1), estimated by the LDAR system, and 10(7)-10(8) m s(-1), estimated by the ONERA-3D system. We infer that this difference occurs because most of the radiation sources mapped with LDAR are associated with virgin breakdown processes typical of slowly propagating negative leaders. On the other hand, most of the radiation sources mapped with ONERA-3D are produced by fast intermittent negative breakdown processes typical of dart leaders and K changes as they traverse the previously ionized channels. Thus each operational system may emphasize different stages of the lightning flash, but neither appears to map the entire flash.