Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: A comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia

被引:122
作者
Larsen, B [1 ]
Seitz, A [1 ]
Larsen, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Homburg Saar, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-66424 Homburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200001000-00035
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We compared the recovery characteristics of remifentanil, desflurane, and sevoflurane when used for anesthesia in elective operative procedures. Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18-65 yr, were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil-propofol, desflurane-N2O, or sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Before the induction of anesthesia, the patients of the desflurane and sevoflurane groups received fentanyl 2 mu g/kg. In all groups, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained either with remifentanil 0.25 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1), desflurane, or sevoflurane 0.85 MAC with 65% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Anesthetics were titrated to achieve an adequate level of surgical anesthesia and to maintain mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline values. Early recovery times and a modified Aldrete Recovery Score > 9 were recorded. Trieger Dot Test and Digit Substitution Test (DSST) were performed the day before surgery and in the postanesthesia care unit to evaluate intermediate recovery. The remifentanil-propofol group had a significantly faster emergence than desflurane or sevoflurane, with no difference between both inhaled anesthetics. Thirty min after anesthesia administration, patients in the remifentanil-propofol and in the desflurane groups gave significantly more correct responses in the DSST compared with sevoflurane (remifentanil 87%, desflurane 83%, sevoflurane 56%), the impairment in the sevoflurane patients corresponding to the effects of a blood alcohol level. of approximately 0.1% and, thus, being of clinical importance. Ninety minutes after anesthesia administration, no significant difference could be demonstrated among the groups in the DSST scores. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration. Implications: We compared awakening and intermediate recovery times after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia to desflurane-N2O and sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 174
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   THE POSTANESTHESIA RECOVERY SCORE REVISITED [J].
ALDRETE, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (01) :89-91
[2]   Awakening, clinical recovery, and psychomotor effects after desflurane and propofol anesthesia [J].
Apfelbaum, JL ;
Lichtor, JL ;
Lane, BS ;
Coalson, DW ;
Korttila, KT .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (04) :721-725
[3]   Context-sensitive half-times and other decrement times of inhaled anesthetics [J].
Bailey, JM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (03) :681-686
[4]   CONCENTRATIONS OF DESFLURANE AND PROPOFOL THAT SUPPRESS RESPONSE TO COMMAND IN HUMANS [J].
CHORTKOFF, BS ;
EGER, EI ;
CRANKSHAW, DP ;
GONSOWSKI, CT ;
DUTTON, RC ;
IONESCU, P .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :737-743
[5]   Recovery and kinetic characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane in volunteers after 8-h exposure, including kinetics of degradation products [J].
Eger, EI ;
Bowland, T ;
Ionescu, P ;
Laster, MJ ;
Fang, ZX ;
Gong, D ;
Sonner, J ;
Weiskopf, RB .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) :517-526
[6]   Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in paediatric patients: a comparison with a desflurane-nitrous oxide inhalation anaesthesia [J].
Grundman, U ;
Uth, M ;
Eichner, A ;
Wilhelm, W ;
Larsen, R .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (07) :845-850
[7]   A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery [J].
Hogue, CW ;
Bowdle, TA ;
OLeary, C ;
Duncalf, D ;
Miguel, R ;
Pitts, M ;
Streisand, J ;
Kirvassilis, G ;
Jamerson, B ;
McNeal, S ;
Batenhorst, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (02) :279-285
[8]  
KATOH T, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P348
[9]   Induction, recovery, and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery - A comparison with halothane [J].
Lerman, J ;
Davis, PJ ;
Welborn, LG ;
Orr, RJ ;
Rabb, M ;
Carpenter, R ;
Motoyama, E ;
Hannallah, R ;
Haberkern, CM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (06) :1332-1340
[10]   Anaesthesia for videoarthroscopy of the knee -: A comparison between desflurane and sevoflurane [J].
Naidu-Sjösvärd, K ;
Sjöberg, F ;
Gupta, A .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (04) :464-471