Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements

被引:120
作者
John, MS [1 ]
Picton, TW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
auditory evoked potential; steady-state response; apparent latency; phase; travelling wave;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00209-9
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Human auditory steady-state responses were recorded to four stimuli, with carrier frequencies VE) of 750, 1500, 3000 and 6000 Hz, presented simultaneously at 60 dB SPL. Each carrier frequency was modulated by a specific modulation frequency (f(m)) of 80.6, 85.5, 90.3 or 95.2 Hz. By using four different recording conditions we obtained responses for all permutations of f(m) and f(c). The phase delays (P) of the responses were unwrapped and converted to latency (L) using the equation: L = P/(360 x f(m)). The number of cycles of the stimulus that occurred prior to the recorded response was estimated by analyzing the effect of modulation frequency on the responses. These calculations provided latencies of 20.7, 17.7, 16.1 and 16.1 ms for carrier frequencies 750, 1500, 3000 and 6000 Hz. This latency difference of about 4.5 ms between low and high carrier frequencies remained constant over many different manipulations of the stimuli: faster modulation rates (150-190 Hz), binaural rather than monaural presentation, different intensities, stimuli presented alone or in conjunction with other stimuli, and modulation frequencies that were separated by as little as 0.24 Hz. This frequency-related delay is greater than that measured using transient evoked potentials, most likely because of differences in how transient and steady-state responses are generated and how their latencies are determined. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 79
页数:23
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   TEMPORAL POSITION OF DISCHARGES IN SINGLE AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS WITHIN CYCLE OF A SINE-WAVE STIMULUS - FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY EFFECTS [J].
ANDERSON, DJ ;
ROSE, JE ;
HIND, JE ;
BRUGGE, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1971, 49 (04) :1131-&
[2]   GENERATION OF HUMAN AUDITORY STEADY-STATE RESPONSES (SSRS) .1. STIMULUS RATE EFFECTS [J].
AZZENA, GB ;
CONTI, G ;
SANTARELLI, R ;
OTTAVIANI, F ;
PALUDETTI, G ;
MAURIZI, M .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 83 (1-2) :1-8
[3]  
BASAR E, 1987, INT J NEUROSCI, V33, P103
[4]   HEARING THEORIES AND COMPLEX SOUNDS [J].
BEKESY, GV .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1963, 35 (04) :588-&
[5]   NEURAL CONDUCTION TIME AND STEADY-STATE EVOKED-POTENTIALS [J].
BIJL, GK ;
VERINGA, F .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (06) :465-467
[6]   The effect of sound intensity on f(1)-sweep and f(2)-sweep distortion product otoacoustic emissions phase delay estimates in human adults [J].
Bowman, DM ;
Brown, DK ;
Eggermont, JJ ;
Kimberley, BP .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 101 (03) :1550-1559
[7]  
BROWN D, 1994, J OTOLARYNGOL, V23, P234
[8]  
BROWN PB, 1982, ELECT MODERN SCI
[9]   A MODEL FOR THE RESPONSES OF LOW-FREQUENCY AUDITORY-NERVE FIBERS IN CAT [J].
CARNEY, LH .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 93 (01) :401-417
[10]   AUDITORY NONLINEARITIES MEASURED WITH AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS [J].
CHERTOFF, ME ;
HECOX, KE .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (03) :1248-1254