Remote sensing of cloud properties using ground-based measurements of zenith radiance

被引:34
作者
Chiu, J. Christine
Marshak, Alexander
Knyazikhin, Yuri
Wiscombe, Warren J.
Barker, Howard W.
Barnard, James C.
Luo, Yi
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Joint Ctr Earth Syst Technol, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[2] NASA, Climate & Radiat Branch, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Geog, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Meteorol Serv Canada, Cloud Phys Res Div, Downsview, ON M3H 5T4, Canada
[5] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[6] Nat Resources Canada, Canada Ctr Remote Sensing, Ottawa, ON K1A 0Y7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005JD006843
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] We have conducted the first extensive field test of two new methods to retrieve optical properties for overhead clouds that range from patchy to overcast. The methods use measurements of zenith radiance at 673 and 870 nm wavelengths and require the presence of green vegetation in the surrounding area. The test was conducted at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Oklahoma site during September - November 2004. These methods work because at 673 nm ( red) and 870 nm ( near infrared (NIR)), clouds have nearly identical optical properties, while vegetated surfaces reflect quite differently. The first method, dubbed REDvsNIR, retrieves not only cloud optical depth tau but also radiative cloud fraction. Because of the 1-s time resolution of our radiance measurements, we are able for the first time to capture changes in cloud optical properties at the natural timescale of cloud evolution. We compared values of tau retrieved by REDvsNIR to those retrieved from downward shortwave fluxes and from microwave brightness temperatures. The flux method generally underestimates tau relative to the REDvsNIR method. Even for overcast but inhomogeneous clouds, differences between REDvsNIR and the flux method can be as large as 50%. In addition, REDvsNIR agreed to better than 15% with the microwave method for both overcast and broken clouds. The second method, dubbed COUPLED, retrieves tau by combining zenith radiances with fluxes. While extra information from fluxes was expected to improve retrievals, this is not always the case. In general, however, the COUPLED and REDvsNIR methods retrieve tau to within 15% of each other.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Assessing a cloud optical depth retrieval algorithm with model-generated data and the frozen turbulence assumption [J].
Barker, HW ;
Pavloski, CF ;
Ovtchinnikov, M ;
Clothiaux, EE .
JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2004, 61 (23) :2951-2956
[2]  
Barker HW, 1998, J CLIMATE, V11, P2980, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<2980:ODOOCA>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Barker HW, 2001, J ATMOS SCI, V58, P2989, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<2989:IODOBC>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Estimating cloud optical depth from surface radiometric observations: Sensitivity to instrument noise and aerosol contamination [J].
Beaulne, A ;
Barker, HW ;
Blanchet, JP .
JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2005, 62 (11) :4095-4104
[7]   Simultaneous retrievals of cloud optical depth and droplet concentration from solar irradiance and microwave liquid water path [J].
Boers, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D25) :29881-29891
[8]  
BOX MA, 1988, BEITR PHYS ATMOS, V61, P303
[9]   Microphysical and radiative properties of boundary layer stratiform clouds deduced from ground-based measurements [J].
Dong, XQ ;
Ackerman, TP ;
Clothiaux, EE ;
Pilewskie, P ;
Han, Y .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D20) :23829-23843
[10]   AERONET - A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization [J].
Holben, BN ;
Eck, TF ;
Slutsker, I ;
Tanre, D ;
Buis, JP ;
Setzer, A ;
Vermote, E ;
Reagan, JA ;
Kaufman, YJ ;
Nakajima, T ;
Lavenu, F ;
Jankowiak, I ;
Smirnov, A .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 66 (01) :1-16