Assessing the effects of spatial discretization on large-scale flow model performance and prediction uncertainty

被引:33
作者
Wildemeersch, S. [1 ]
Goderniaux, P. [2 ]
Orban, Ph [1 ]
Brouyere, S. [1 ]
Dassargues, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, ArGEnCo, GEO3, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Univ Mons, Fac Engn, Fundamental & Appl Geol Dept, B-7000 Mons, Belgium
关键词
Spatial discretization; Model performance; Sensitivity analysis; Automatic calibration; Prediction uncertainty; LEAF-AREA INDEX; RICHARDS EQUATION; GROUNDWATER-FLOW; HETEROGENEITY; CALIBRATION; GUIDELINES; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.020
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Large-scale physically-based and spatially-distributed models (>100 km(2)) constitute useful tools for water management since they take explicitly into account the heterogeneity and the physical processes occurring in the subsurface for predicting the evolution of discharge and hydraulic heads for several predictive scenarios. However, such models are characterized by lengthy execution times. Therefore, modelers often coarsen spatial discretization of large-scale physically-based and spatially-distributed models for reducing the number of unknowns and the execution times. This study investigates the influence of such a coarsening of model grid on model performance and prediction uncertainty. The improvement of model performance obtained with an automatic calibration process is also investigated. The results obtained show that coarsening spatial discretization mainly influences the simulation of discharge due to a poor representation of surface water network and a smoothing of surface slopes that prevents from simulating properly surface water-groundwater interactions and runoff processes. Parameter sensitivities are not significantly influenced by grid coarsening and calibration can compensate, to some extent, for model errors induced by grid coarsening. The results also show that coarsening spatial discretization mainly influences the uncertainty on discharge predictions. However, model prediction uncertainties on discharge only increase significantly for very coarse spatial discretizations. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 25
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
ISLAM MN, 2004, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[32]  
Jones J., 2005, THESIS U WATERLOO
[33]  
Kristensen K. J., 1975, NORD HYDROL, V6, DOI [10.2166/nh.1975.012, DOI 10.2166/NH.1975.0012]
[34]   Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation [J].
Legates, DR ;
McCabe, GJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (01) :233-241
[35]   Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model [J].
Li, Q. ;
Unger, A. J. A. ;
Sudicky, E. A. ;
Kassenaar, D. ;
Wexler, E. J. ;
Shikaze, S. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 357 (3-4) :317-336
[36]  
McCuen R.H., 1989, HYDROLOGIC ANAL DESI
[37]  
Meyerhoff SB, 2011, HYDROGEOL J, V19, P1515, DOI 10.1007/s10040-011-0753-y
[38]   Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations [J].
Moriasi, D. N. ;
Arnold, J. G. ;
Van Liew, M. W. ;
Bingner, R. L. ;
Harmel, R. D. ;
Veith, T. L. .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2007, 50 (03) :885-900
[39]  
Nash J. E., 1970, Journal of Hydrology, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
[40]   A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow [J].
Panday, S ;
Huyakorn, PS .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2004, 27 (04) :361-382